If vote counting malfeasance can be "proven" to SCOTUS/constitutional 
standards, then perhaps a full or partial re-election could be ordered by the 
Supreme Court?

If Trump manages to hold onto power through this turmoil, certainly a rigorous 
plan for "integrifying" the US vote system should happen - perhaps to be backed 
by a referendum of the people.



On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 09:16:03PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Very disappointing of course.
> 
> https://notthebee.com/article/here-are-mi-and-wi-tallies-last-night-vs-this-morning-i-am-just-going-to-leave-this-here-for-you-without-comment
> 
> https://www.zerohedge.com/political/detroit-ballot-counters-board-windows-block-republican-poll-watchers
> 
> https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-surprise-ballot-dumps-behind-lead-changes
> 
> https://www.zerohedge.com/political/where-vote-stands-each-key-undecided-state
> 
> 
> Except that some ground for unconstitutionality can be fairly raised (how can 
> "failure to allow vote counting monitors" (and boarding up the windows) be 
> remotely constitutional?), then it appears that the USA, and therefore much 
> of the west, is about to be fed a large dose of socialism (i.e. 
> neo-communism).
> 
> This is quite unfortunate, but on the other hand should speed up the US 
> dollar collapse.
> 
> Yay for the end of the empire, not so yay for the good people of North 
> America.
> 
> This is the low IQ individuals getting their way, so clueless that they have 
> no idea what's coming.
> 
> 
>   Biden: "I'm so sick of smart people."
> 
>   AOC: "Having to work again? We are NOT going back to that!"
> 
> 
> The outcome is still uncertain, but a very disappointing result in any case...
> 
> Seems many folks simply won't learn without hardship.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 03:38:18AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> >  Well, it looks like I spoke too soon!   However, the 'consolation prize' 
> > is that it is so obvious that a 'coup' is attempted that I am satisfied 
> > that a segment of the public will be outraged.   The people at the FBI and 
> > DOJ who deliberately failed to properly investigate Biden's fraud, and 
> > failed to publicize it, can be investigated by hearings in the Senate.
> > 
> >               Jim Bell
> >     On Tuesday, November 3, 2020, 11:02:35 PM PST, jim bell 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:  
> >  
> >  Fortunately, "the coup" was stopped.  But it wasn't the coup some people 
> > anticipated.   In 2016, the leadership of the FBI attempted a coup, by the 
> > trick of refusing to prosecute Hitlery Clinton for violations of the 
> > Espionage Act.  Comey knew that if Hitlery had been indicted, she 
> > definitely would have lost.  He hoped that by not indicting Hitlery, she 
> > might win.  He chose the only path available to him that might let her win. 
> >  Yet, she didn't win, anyway.  That's why I called that an "attempted coup".
> > In December 2019, the FBI was given a computer laptop which contained 
> > Hunter Biden's hard drive information.  The public  only learned of this 
> > information in late September 2020, which seemed to be too late to expose 
> > what Joe and Hunter Biden had been doing, playing footsie with Ukraine and 
> > China. So by concealing this information, once again the FBI tried to stage 
> > a coup, hoping that the public would only learn, too late, how this crook 
> > had been foisted on them.  
> > I can only assume that the public smelled a rat, and decided that they 
> > didn't dare give control of the Federal government to Joe Biden for four 
> > years.
> > Not incidentally, on Election Day, Joe Biden confused the names of his two 
> > granddaughters, and introduced one of them as his dead son, Beau Biden.  
> > And this guy wanted us to give his finger authority over the nuclear 
> > button!   What unmitigated gall!  
> > I'm proud to have voted...for Jo Jorgensen, the Libertarian candidate. (I 
> > live in Washington state, which as I write this Yahoo/AP said went 61% for 
> > Biden.)    No, Jo didn't win, but the public didn't lose nearly as badly as 
> > it could have.
> > Coup averted.  
> >            Jim Bell
> >   

Reply via email to