On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:03:52PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > When including all candidates this became... > > https://mielections.us/election/results/2020GEN_CENR.html > sn 1105202042301 20201105T0500 > turn 4700688 > tot 4646928 > diff 53760 > t 2373024 > b 2200470 > diff 172554 > t .5106 > b .4735 > diff .0371 > > sn 11052020133301 20201105T1430 > turn 5568097 > tot 5508749 > diff 59348 > t 2637173 > b 2787544 > diff -150371 > t .4787 > b .5060 > diff -.0272 > > 60k votes sitting in the count queue, and 865k/9h levels worth > of turnout apparently still rolling into the queue. Without analyzing > county and other trends, which is done by pundits to some fair extent... > making calls, or declaring or conceding, is silly and goes to the > absurdity of it all.
The Art of Counting Votes https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2020-11-05/art-counting-votes https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1324093624611532800.html https://threadreaderapp.com/user/KimStrassel 3) True, Wisconsin has same day voter registration. But to be at 71%, WI would have yesterday needed 900k same-day registrations. ( If I'm doing my math wrong--please tell me. 3,288,771 divided by 4,588,771 equals 71% . 4,588,771 minus 3,684,726 =900k) 4) Is that possible/conceivable? That would be akin to increasing WI's registered voting population by up to 30%--in one day. It would also suggest that if those same-day registrations hadn't happened, WI would have had a ridiculously LOW turnout. 5) I suppose it is possible WI's turnout was higher than 71% (again, not sure where MJS gets that). But that would be wild, given the state's own history and what we saw elsewhere yesterday. An even an 80% turnout would still require HUGE same-day registration. 7) So, more. I compared some vote totals to voter registration--by county. Nearly every county i've looked at so far--left and right--registered turnout of 89% or higher. (several at 93%) I suppose its possible--but still seems extraordinary. 8) I think high voter turnout is great, and if WI truly did this, wow. I only question it because it is so strikingly at odds with any other state. 9)One thing that makes more sense is if MSP number of 71% if referring to voting-eligible population (rather than registered voters). But still, wow--89% turnout of registered voters....
