(honestly i am very confused by an assumption of discerning a private key by hope for collision, as a normal thing without explanation or reminder of some new change in technology or research making this reasonable. i can't tell what is real here.)
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:17 PM Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > > i haven't been following closely, but it seems to me that > spam.trap.mailing.lists made a not-presently-debunked comparison > between the difficulty of finding a useful collision (goes down with > time: more keys to collide with) and the difficulty of solving the > proof of work (goes up with time). > > the linked mailing list has no further posts. i like to imagine > everybody too busy making money by finding hash collisions, to post. > > usually hash collisions are unreasonable to find on a vps, of course. > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:07 PM grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 11/9/20, Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [Bitcoin...] not environment friendly due to high energy consumption? > > > > Your claim was already thoroughly and entirely debunked. > > Please stop trying.
