On 11/15/20, jam...@echeque.com <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: >> On 11/15/20, jam...@echeque.com <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: >>> To this end, the US government under Obama and Hillary funded and armed >>> ISIS, which Russia was none too happy about. > > On 2020-11-16 08:28, Karl wrote: >> That sounds to me like the kind of thing that would be c1assified >> information. How did you learn this? > > It is only a secret if you keep your head in the sand. > > ISIS funding is all over wikileaks, and all over the Clinton emails, > which one of the many reasons why batsoup and rat hate wikileaks so > much. Pretending that it is secret is like "No proof of fake ballots". > For a sufficiently high and ever escalating standard of proof. > > Asking me how I know the state Department armed and funded ISIS is like > asking me how I know that seven hundred thousand fake ballots were added > the pile in the early hours of Wednesday morning in Pensylvania. These > things are officially secret, but not actually secret at all.
I don't expect the ballot information is on wikileaks yet ... > > Direct funding and arming of Free Syria Army was open and overt, and > Free Syria army was in fact ISIS, something very widely known, and very > widely complained about, and a pipeline for US arms to ISIS. > > It is as secret as the Democrats printing themselves ballots. Wikileaks sounds important. I recall there's been a lot of controversy around them.