On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 2:40 PM jim bell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 11:23:41 AM PST, jim bell < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey > admits 'this action was wrong' > https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story-hearing-dorsey > > > Jim Bell's comment:. Facebook and Twitter manipulated the 2020 election > far more effectively than Russia (which spent $1.5 million per month, for > about 4 months) did for the 2016 election. > But...I still want to know who delayed the leak of the news of Hunter > Biden's laptop from mid-December, when the FBI received that device, until > late September 2020. Who had THAT motivation? > Biden wasn't selected as nominee for many months after Dec 2019. But > certainly by the time of that nomination, the time would have been ripe to > leak this material. Why wait much later than that? > A stereotypical pro-Trump partisan > > [for some reason, my comment was unintentionally cut off at this point] > might be expected to want to wait until Biden's nomination, to ensure that > the Democrats commit to Biden. But instead, somebody waited until late > September 2020 to spill the beans. WHO benefits from that further delay? > > Jim Bell >
The democrats? (And whoever benefits from two balanced primary parties?) Do you use an open source email editor to debug editing issues with? >
