On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 12:08 PM Karl <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 11:17 AM coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 3:23 AM, professor rat <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03348-4
>> >
>> > ‘It will change everything’: DeepMind’s AI makes gigantic leap in
>> solving protein structures
>>
>>
>> one day, not long from now, DeepMind develops an uber-Novichok, and an
>> influenza-variola.
>>
>> the problem with technology is that it advances while humanity stagnates.
>> inevitably will lead to calamity!  (USA humans invest more in killing than
>> teaching, as one example.)
>>
>> till then, best regards,
>>
>
> (I'm re-experiencing a human trafficking thing I haven't found therapy
> for, and believing I am being forced to post to this list.  When I try to
> do other things, I suddenly change my mind and turn my body away from
> them.  I am not having that experience with this list, and that is very
> pleasant, but I do not like expressing without considering what I am saying
> more than I know how right now.)
>
> Regarding machine learning, there're a lot of open source tools out there,
> but I can't find any open source general intelligence projects, or ones
> focused on core things like that mediation, or productive large scale
> discourse.
>

Oh!  And citizen security!

There used to be a lot of open source general intelligence projects, so I'm
> probably in a search-engine-results bubble of some sort.  I notice
> additionally that such projects tend not to survive well, like many kinds
> of open source projects.
>
>>

Reply via email to