I posted this 15 months ago.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 7:55 AM, jim bell<[email protected]> wrote: This is a pointer to Assange's superseding indictment. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1165556/download Criminal No. 1:18-cr-l 11 (CMH)Count 1: 18 U.S.C.§ 793(g)Conspiracy To Receive National DefenseInformationCounts 2-4:18 U.S.C. § 793(b) and 2Obtaining National Defense InformationCounts 5-8: 18 U.S.C. § 793(c) and 2Obtaining National Defense InformationCounts 9-11: 18 U.S.C. § 793(d) and 2Disclosure of National Defense InformationCounts 12-14: 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) and 2Disclosure of National Defense InformationCounts 15-17: 18 U.S.C. § 793(e)Disclosure of National Defense InformationCount 18: 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1030Conspiracy To Commit Computer Intrusion =================== I still don't see any indication that 18 U.S.C. 793 is extraterritorial: That is apparently necessary for a prosecution for actions taken outside the U.S. Similarly, I don't see an indication that 18 U.S.C. 371 is extraterritorial. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371 Nor do I see that 18 U.S.C. 1030 is extraterritorial. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030 For an example of a law which claims Extraterritorial jurisdiction, see: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 "(h)There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section." Jim Bell
