On 1/8/21, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Friday, January 8, 2021 8:01 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > ... >> it's notable that pgp encourages end-to-end encryption and protonmail >> does not, no? > > if we both use protonmail, then it is end-to-end encrypted. (but you're > running "code" from protonmail - a trusted third party.) > > there is a good explanation of their benefits (vs. gmail, etc.) here: > https://protonmail.com/security-details > > note that running your own mail server removes a trusted third party! > > (but running your own mail servers sucks for many other reasons...) > > > > >> did you make a signed post when you stopped using PGP, so that people >> would know you hadn't been coerced or manipulated to do so, or >> replaced by an impostor or a gpt-in-the-middle? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > hey Karl, email encryption still sucks :) > > > best regards, > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iNUEAREKAH0WIQSug7JItF9+Ek5e5vZQzZ94LsSMswUCX/jbC18UgAAAAAAuAChp > c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0QUU4 > M0IyNDhCNDVGN0UxMjRFNUVFNkY2NTBDRDlGNzgyRUM0OENCMwAKCRBQzZ94LsSM > s632AP99aH2NESOcnjQ6sEN87hMXLwBlFVMzxvZCdyhPBxi17gD+J0oh3eG7HcKt > uKiNloa9pfwqMFzcYhNHzC/dkIFT8tc= > =cLPa > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
coderman and I were forced to aid government surveillance. we were also forced to cover this up. coderman is not able to talk about this safely. > > > bonus points for finding that key *grin* > >
