On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:32 PM Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Need logs, and dialogue around the logs to make a clear case for > decentralised cryptographic solutions. > > On 1/9/21, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Saturday, January 9, 2021 4:55 PM, Stefan Claas > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I had yesterday a similar expierence with Usenet. > >> > >> Posting from one server allowed me only to post to one group and > >> not the other, so I had to switch the server for the second message. > > > > > > who remembers netsplits? > > > > (i did the other day, when slack went down :) > > > > > > > > best regards,
Not sure what you mean with need logs, language barrier, but a couple of days ago I was thinking about going back to the roots. We all know that, for example, IPv6 would allow all citizens on this planet to have an own dedicated IPv6, if it would roll out. Since I doubt this will happen, because I see no advancements in this direction, when one thinks that it would already proposed in the 90s, I thought about to find a way, let's say with a Raspberry Pi to do good old UUCP somehow, without encryption (first), in such a way that we would have a global decentralized network (non-commercially) where users could use email and have Usenet. Simly a communication platform, like the list here, but denzentralised. Regards Stefan
