Thanks for your nice replies. my mind is scattered, but i'm sending this e-mail to do the friendly reply thing. if you have a link to your validation project maybe i can test it out or something.
>> Hi coderman ^ any middle monkeys, > *waves* >> What problem spaces do you see or are passionate about? >> Are you working on anything? > > right now i am working on technology that facilitates content > discovery, sourcing, and validation. > > if you can validate information on social media, it becomes news. > > if you invalidate claims on social media, it becomes misinformation. > > distinguishing between news and misinfo is a hard problem, and > critical to fighting lies, misinformation, propaganda, etc. what can we do to support your work? [that sounds like cool (and important) work. i'm curious. I always think towards pointing towards blockchained history, to validate things. I rediscovered prolog and logic programming recently. Interesting ideas of formal validation of statements of facts. Machine learning algorithms can now somewhat break the automation barrier between statement and experience.] >> I've also been deniably brainwashed so I work on eeg technology >> sometimes, so such things can have more proof some day. > > i look forward to turning these read-only brain technologies into > read/write :P there's been read/write tech for some time, although that hasn't been my focus. what are you looking for in this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_direct-current_stimulation >> I'm interested in most other parts of problem spaces but haven't worked >> on most of them recently. Often I find myself gravitating towards AI >> technology which is clearly and slowly replacing software development. >> In my edge spaces I work with open hardware and radio a little. > > check out this 2.6 trillion transistor processor for AI workloads : > https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors/processors/cerebras-giant-ai-chip-now-has-a-trillions-more-transistors > > we'll likely see this level of compute in personal hands in our lifetimes > :) i've always been big on optimising algorithms, but yeah it does look like that kind of thing will happen pretty soon. >> I'm not sure I'm _able_ to help these situations with work ... not >> because >> it is technically impossible, but because of my brainwashing ... > > even if you can't directly contribute, there is value in learning and > testing > these technologies - you never know who will find your experience relevant > to > what they're up to. small parts! small parts =)
