-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
hello Karl, this sounds like great fun :) my comments below in the clear, as usual... ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, May 22, 2021 4:53 AM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: ... > It seems ridiculous to me, as a lifelong hobby algorithm > researcher, to require an expensive radio with an fpga, > to implement a sample algorithm, when computers have massive > gpus nowadays and common math libraries to use them. I'm > sad the researchers implemented their algorithm on an fpga, > making it harder for people to use the reason FPGA's are so common, particularly in TX scenarios is that time constraints for low level protocols are extremely tight. there is a non-trivial amount of latency for a round- trip to the bus, and then operating system is non-real-time. if you are receiving only, then this becomes less important so for your use case, maybe just downcoverters and RTL-SDR? keep going! you'll only make it better :) best regards, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEAREKAH0WIQRBwSuMMH1+IZiqV4FlqEfnwrk4DAUCYKldul8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0NDFD MTJCOEMzMDdEN0UyMTk4QUE1NzgxNjVBODQ3RTdDMkI5MzgwQwAKCRBlqEfnwrk4 DLZWAP4ypTTMnA+cZnQAA7lr/yvMWnmy1KhMzeKp5oBN/L8+xAEAtVRMMXFeTe4Y qRpXg8nzvVWoCPA11W0nHQecC8V5vnQ= =lEdl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
