Meant to send this privately. No worries it wasn't. On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 4:19 PM Karl Semich <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 12:09 PM David Barrett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Kind of related to this, but for corporate rather than political >> purposes: https://www.protocol.com/expensify-ceo-silenced-no-mor >> <https://www.protocol.com/expensify-ceo-silenced-no-more>e >> > > That's a great thing, David. Thank you. Not sure why you're on this > kinda-messed-up list, maybe for the tidbits that fall out sometimes. > > It does read to me like the article leaves out two things that are pretty > important: > - confirmation or a date that the nda's are actually amended > - letting people disclose illegal acts done in the name of the business, > as well as between people in the workplace > > Not meaning to argue anything, just relating how it read to me. > > Apologies for below cruft; on mobile. > > On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 5:22 AM grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/1/21, stef <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > wasn't intelexit an art project by the berlin peng! collective? >>> >>> Yes, and also by Schneier and Drake, but it's not purely art >>> since they do take intake, even if it only ends up in a referral. >>> >>> There was also OpenLeaks by ?Dan D-Berg?, which is long dead. >>> DDoSecrets. >>> Cryptome. >>> And a few other uniques. >>> >>> Plus all the news media digging for scraps >>> ever since WL went inactive while still sitting >>> on old, and intaking new, docs. >>> >>> Almost no services mentioned in this entire thread have >>> or will ever publish currently active TOP-SECRET/SCI >>> unredacted for its full impact. >>> >>> And the choice of where to go, from self-publishing into >>> the darknet, up through formal GovCorp whistleblowing >>> channels, is certainly not easy. >>> >>> That's another reason GovCorp wants to keep WL on ice >>> in limbo forever... no resolution = a FUD environment >>> keeping new leakers mentally trapped inside it. >>> >>> There's a path out of that trap... >>> >>> If what you see is wrong, there's really no option >>> but to do the right thing. >>> >>
