This seems uncontroversial  - open borders in the absence of a command economy 
and full-spectrum welfare ie national-healthcare-style state is decidedly 
pro-market, pro-freedom, and pro-peace.

Certainly open-borders are as intrinsic to crypto-anarchism as 
diversity-of-tactics. That is certainly uncontroversial. 

It may be that some self-described cypherpunk might decide to advocate for 
border controls for some reason. The onus is then on them to prove their case.  

Such as in Jeff Berwick Vs John Galton 

However no crypto-anarchist will be caught dead arguing for nationalist 
borders; I promise youse.

Reply via email to