Someone leaked the internal logs. (2014) Tor hasn’t felt the need to make any statements about the leaked data. when i asked, the community team lead (Tor) wrote to me He said:
I'm curious about "the daily log was leaked". What does this exactly mean? He learned that information from me. Then Tor and he stopped. That's what I said. I wanted to keep people informed. Sent from ProtonMail for iOS Açık Çar, Eyl 29, 2021 06:32, grarpamp <[email protected]> yazdı: > On 9/28/21, zeynepaydogan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Use a no-logs VPN. > > No logs is often bullshit... VPN's may honestly launch with no logs, > but soon turn to keeping logs, or logging and trojaning and NITting > requested users by/for GovCorp, etc. Either way, you have zero insurance, > audit, or inspection that anything they say regarding logs is true. > There is also no penalty, if operators are not well known big public persons > the VPN's just shutdown, rebrand, reboot. > > Assuming that everything is logged forever is the > better starting point. > >> The Tor project can’t help anonymously. > > Software tor is good at some things. > But quite bad at other things. > Even the NSA said "Tor Stinks" not all of the time, and > that was based at least 10 years ago... today's NSA > can say that tor stinks even worse at protecting > users due to NSA and other attackers advancements in > Traffic Analysis, Sybil, etc. Meanwhile tor's fundamental > design and deployment has stayed 100% the same since day 1. > NSA etc +1, Tor 0. > >> Don’t respect a community where > > Don't respect a Tor Project that > - lies false advertising to its users on its homepage > - defrauds buyer of $2M worth of NFT by falsely claiming it was first onion > - refuses to answer records requests from its userbase > - kicks out contributors observers commentators for having different > sociopolitical perspectives, exposing inconvienient truths, etc > - bricks up and censors all its public comms channels > - removes features being actively used by its users, claiming > it has sole use-case authority over its userbase and users, > while providing bogus orthagonal and non-detailed arguments > to support removal > - etc, etc, etc... read all the mail lists > >> in 2014, the daily log was leaked. > > What exactly, with links, are you talking about? > >> Tor hasn't made a statement about it. >> Tor and the team leader didn't answer my questions. > > Tor Project Inc, its employees, and core "community" of > hangers-on, crumb gobbling handout chasers, wokesters, > and opportunist$-by-association... haven't made statements > or answered a lot of questions a lot of people have asked. > >> And some of them work in highest ranked position on Google. > > Google are known spies and apologists for Governments, > search results distorters, undue influencers, Youtube Censors, etc. > >> the Tor community team > > Partisan, self-dealing, non-independant, censorious. > Good luck trying to ombud anything to them. > >> TOR may be transferring daily-log to an institution > > Tor has "partnered" with, been silent on, with such institutions > like EDU's and research labs, and been called out for it in the past. > Even some of them institutions were working to exploit users, even > working for or giving exploit tech or de-anon'd users to governments. > > Tor also have a laughable "ethical research" policy, who > have on numerous occaisions "convinced" public researchers > to stop their proposed or works in progress, but all other attackers > happily ignore and never write papers or full disclosure about, thus > users remain in the public dark about details what tor really > can and cannot do, what attacks are being attempted against them. > And Tor Project whitewashes any remaining "coordinated release" > through their professionally managed and massaged comms and > prop channels. > > After all, Tor Project employees could lose their $Millions > in government and donor funding if a more balanced > picture was made, thus reducing the paychecks to > zero, the home mortgages to default, etc. > So is there any conflict of interest there, you decide. > > Tor the Project, and tor the software, are different but > related and interdependent things. That makes some > users and analysts uncomfortable. > > There are hardly any operational encrypted anonymous > overlay networks from which to choose. Some exist for > dedicated purposes like messaging, crypto, storage etc, > but almost none are a general purpose transport net, > or net for running existing IPv6 applications, etc. > > All thus, there should be new softwares made and > launched from new and anonymous un-Projects. > Use parts of designs from existing projects as needed. > > That is the cypherpunk way. > > Because... "Tor Stinks -- NSA".
