hey PR, I'm thinking about your mini article. I don't fully understand but I kind of like parts of it.
i'm hoping I can find ways to communicate better with you. do you know how I could do this better? I always think nowadays of disparate groups talking and working together on their common goals. so I like the idea you mention below of mixing together of different approaches. I sometimes think there might always be more options, somewhere, too. ck On Sun, Oct 10, 2021, 6:31 PM professor rat <[email protected]> wrote: > Two main ways to do this ( and they can miscegenate ) > > 1) Basically peaceful coexistence with the powers-that-be - ' loyal > opposition ', collaboration. > Drift along - pretend there never were any anarchist revolutionaries - or > they never did enough. > Remain ignorant, conformist, craven. > Its too hard to make anyone understand anarchist revolution when their > identities depend on them not understanding it. Then there's > > 2) Substitution. Bait with " Peace, bread and freedom ' - then switch to > crypto-fascism. > Let that small army of batshit-crazy, inverse-Marxist Nazbols over-run the > narrative. Give every mincing, bow-tied, gold-bug a microphone. Allow every > wanna-be Dolfuss / Pinochet to take over every El Salvador and Ethiopia out > there. Elevate all Randite, Paultard Austro-Libertarian nutcase to > world-historical thought-leader status. > Death to crypto-anarchy - LONG LIVE CYBER-LIBERTY! > > The best lack all convictions for assaulting police while the worst > Wikileaks type chickenshits are filled with a passionate intensity. > > Hey - lets see it doesn't come to that. >
