On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:34 PM Peter Fairbrother <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had a look at the whitepaper - Claudia has outdone herself in > describing a system which could maybe work - but, and I quote, "The > specific algorithms and implementation details of each part of the > system will be fleshed out in separate documents." > > There is no proof, or even enough details, to show that it will or even > could work. It's all sweeping statements and claims, backed up by - nothing. > > Thing is, I don't trust Claudia to get it right (we have a history... ). > > > > The loopix part looks interesting, at first glance. Though "a > measure of sender and receiver unobservability" is not exactly reassuring.. Well, I mentioned Nym, because, once in production, it could be an alternative to Tor. They already have a test net running, consisting of several thousand mix nodes and a couple of gateways. The funding they received this year was a couple of million, so let's see how this pans out. Regards Stefan
