Jeff Epstein, sorry, Jim Epstein, sorry, Alex GLADSTEIN: I guess, what I want 
to get at here is that you start to see this concept of scarcity come in, and 
there's been this tension between privacy and scarcity, always. Not just 
technologically and from an engineering trade-off perspective, but also 
culturally, because it seems like even today, a lot of the privacy community is 
hostile to the scarcity component of Bitcoin. .."

Cryptoanarchy assumes privacy is not a scarce good  - " privacy for the poor - 
transparency for the powerful '.
And Bitcoin's divisibility makes it crypto-anarchist 'enough' to catalyze an 
ongoing world revolution.
 Bitcoin is divisible by up to eight decimal points and, if required, the 
divisibility of bitcoin can be increased to 100 billion smaller parts.
Don't piss liquidity on our leg and tell us there's a credit-squeeze. 

Reply via email to