On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 6:51 PM Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 3:36 PM Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Stefan, I read your reply here as an attempt to disregard and devalue > what I was mentioning, and I was thinking, and realised that usually people > are just not considering the same things. It's hard to remember this, and > I'm sorry I interpreted you this way. > > > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2021, 12:08 PM Stefan Claas < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi Karl, > > simply said, If I communicate with you on a sphere the third party on > that sphere can > intercept our communications, when it spans like a closed mesh around > the sphere. > > When we both communicate on that sphere from one dot not physically > connected > to the other dot, and third parties do not know which dots we both use, > because > they are not connected, it is IMHO not so easy to intercept us. > > As you may know, or not if you have for example an Amazon account you can > purchase there security envelopes, which shows you that a third party had > opened the envelope. I had these discussions long ago on the GnuPG > List. > > Best regards and Good Night > Stefan > Thanks, Stefan. I still don't see how the internet is more interceptable than government postal mail, but I infer it is mostly due to my lack of experience and knowledge. I websearched a little for your name and some keywords to find the discussions you mention. There are a lot of results and I haven't found them yet. Thank you for your tolerance and friendliness with me and with us. >
