i ended up typing more into here.
i would like to leave this document now, as i've sent this file twice
and don't like spamming lists

personal: dddc08bc33897bee425b99a89c4a012fd96ec42c
        maybe a small goal for untangling things and connecting them well

        now experiencing strong physical itch

                note: we experienced expression that our experiences are very 
different from those of other people.
        thanks. helpful, informative. -neuron-cluster :)










Once upon a time there was a lonely little stone block laying by the side of a 
huge anthill in the woods.  A poor lonely zombie was stumbling through the 
woods, when it encountered the little stone block, and picked it up.
"Watch out for ants!" warned the stone block as they were hoisted.
"Borg? I mean ants?" asked the zombie.
The stone block was quiet.  And then the zombie felt something on its left leg. 
 It looked down.
It was hard to see through rotting zombie eyes, but eventually it made out ants 
swarming up its
left leg, maybe looking to find food, or maybe connecting with the scent trails 
they had left
on the block it picked up.
"Oh no!" exclaimed the zombie.  "I might hurt one of these ants!"
"I know I'm so worried!" sympathised the stone block.
The two tried to extricate themselves from the ants as best they could, made 
sure the ants
rebuilt their scent trails well, and dashed off in fear of crawling on the leg.

The zombie was marching down a hiking trail holding its brick, so excited to 
see all the things
around it.  Up came a street light, marching the other way.
"Where do I go to hunt?" asked the street light when it passed.
"Hunt?" asked the zombie, "is that something human or something?"
"You have to listen to the spirits of the wildlife and bring meat and hide home 
to your loving
family," gushed back the street light.  "I just don't know where to start."
The stone block had been laying in the woods for a while.  "I saw some ants a 
ways back.  They're
really good at hunting big insects, they group up together and divy up their 
tasks.  I noticed
a lot of other things, too.  How did you learn about hunting?"
"I'm kind of embarrassed, " blushed the street light, flickering a little.  "I 
just heard somebody
mention it in passing, and it sounded so incredibly exciting to me.  I know I 
can figure it out.
I know it's in my heart somewhere."
"Zombie, let's try this out!" exclaimed the stone block.  "The three of us 
together, we can figure
out hunting!"
"I'm not so sure, " groaned and moaned the zombie from their decaying voicebox, 
"it sounds
important, but before I was turned I think there was something important I 
needed to do."
"Something important?" asked the street light.
"Yes," said the zombie.  "I think I need to make peace between zombies and 
humans, to save the
world."
"That sounds super exciting!" the stone block babbled back.

The zombie and stone block were in a town, hobbling toward a community center.  
The street light
was behind them, with a spread over their shoulder.  A giant fake caterpillar 
was at the end
of the spear, pierced by it.  A hopeful sign hanging from it said, "my first 
meal."

The stone block hobbled their zombie into the community center.  People were 
sitting around,
chatting, having meals.  Somebody was playing music.  Others were reading 
books.  Some were
collecting social benefits they needed.

"Borg?" moaned the zombie, arms rigid in front of them, lurching toward the 
crowd.
"Sorry!" said the stone block. "Hey everybody!  Me and this zombie are here to 
make peace between
humans and zombies.  Is anybody interested?"

Everybody turned and look.  Chatter began.  "Oh! We worked on that so hard 47 
years ago!"
"I remember the big peacemaking talks from the big zombieism outbreak 71 years 
ago!"
"It's so exciting you're doing this!"  "Can I help?"  "How do I get involved?"

The zombie moaned and groaned: "Braaaains ...." and began lurching again, but 
then
interrupted themselves, with a little prompting from the stone brick.
"Sorry!  I mean!  It is so exciting that you are all so interested!  I never 
expected this!"
-----------
        this bit expanded 'everybody has done this before and still wants to do 
it more'

        but our original idea was more the idea of zombie mediator hero
-----------------------------

A zombie cyborg stumbled down a city street.

        Backstory of the Zombie Cyborg.
                The zombie cyborg had a life with some sudden events in it,
                where they were zombified in an outbreak and then almost died 
and
                had the remaining piece of their brain and a few bits of organs 
placed in
                a robot body to sustain their spirit to an appropriate old age.
                The robot body can be in disrepair because part of their brain 
is missing.






























-----------



In an edge area, a small dandelion grew.  At its base was a leaf.
The dandelion leaf was shaped nicely, like a dandelion leaf.





-----

we think one of the reasons karl struggles is because part of his 
'feeling-decision' was miswired
to respond to mind control instead of him, maybe to inhibit something he was 
doing from feelings
                [review considers could overlap awareness and meditative active 
care]

                                {given that information is obvious and part of 
a larger set
                                 of karl's information, the relation may be 
intended to be shared.}


        it's nice realisation. we have hopelessness around overlaps with 
awareness.  strong inhibition.  HOWEVER, the realisation implicitly points out 
that this is not awareness being inhibited.  so it's out of context.  it's 
small, and it's heavily crippling.  unfortunately we are unsure how to heal it.

it feels like it looks like the decision-feeling part has turned away, so 
influence that spreads to it [produces numbness or a result that is not an 
inference, and worsens a little with further energy]. ['looks like' is because 
we were going to sketch it but we are typing]

                there are a lot of those kind of situations in us.  mc uses 
them.
                mc often acts like it expects us to be able to use them as much 
or more than it can.
                but it also expresses [mc-celebration] when exposed to that not 
being the case.


                        we do have some approaches to addressing things like 
this
                        roughly the approaches have attributes of being 
dangerous or delicate
                        or putting one in an altered experience state for maybe 
up to a couple hours
                        where behavior is unpredictable and could be 
random-with-result.
                        additionally they tend to be only partial.
                                [some of them haven't actually worked.
                                 others have worked locally and contextually, 
some.
                                 [others may work only temporarily, these may 
be easier.]]
and there are channels for healing them with positive energy [some of these 
channels have the issue.] [others are unknown, may not be present; usually 
imagined as having the issue heavily, elsewhere]
        ^-- this may relate to mind control being able to use the pattern.
            we struggle to, so healing it is harder.





        karl's view of his mind is limited, from a minority perspective that is 
[quite tangible].
                karl what is meant by this? -mc
                karl is now exploring what he might mean.  this helps mc relax 
a little.
                        i mean that i believe there are many sets of influences 
that i am not describing [etc]

we want safety now.  we have other delicate patterns.  





















ooooooh no

------
karl-maker.  karl-group is _always_ trying to "be-productive."  has _no_ idea 
what this means.
yearns for this!
sweatshop worker looks at karl-productivity, doesn't like it.
        [looks at whole-karl, is worried.  karl clearly needs productivity.]
although one could imagine a sweatshop worker (of course we do not know) 
possibly _disliking_
building-thing.  despite _liking_ organise-home.
maybe guessing not though.  could be freeing to build-thing-at-home, really do 
not know.
don't know!
so, somebody on maker list, is saying they can speak for sweatshop workers, and 
that the
interests of sweatshop workers and makerspaces differ.  _note_: they may be 
speaking
for something else, in addition to or other than sweatshop workers, we don't 
know.
but either way, we could ask them what the needs of a sweatshop worker are.  
this could really
help inform holding a nourishing role on the earth.  and on the list, people 
make decisions
about a huge makerspace, there.

                meanwhile we found a way to connect a little with our 
difficulties building.

----
okay we can try make-up-somebody-else's-experience

productivty: i need to _do_ something, to make _use_ of my time
made-up-different-experience: well don't build stuff.  building stuff is so 
bad.  omigod.
productivity: isn't building things like way better than nothing?
mude: no.  doing nothing would be better than building things.
productivity: how?
mude: building things gives money to slavers.
productivity: it does?
mude: yeah.  you're kinda influenced, so you're likely working for slavers.  
but otherwise, even developing the norm of building things, gives slavers power 
because more people learn these skills and the behaviors of their slaves become 
normalised and ignored.
productivity: what about building things to take down sweatshops?
mude: well that sounds a little interesting
mude: but maybe stop pretending you're a business?  and buying your parts when 
you could build them?

----
mude+productivity sound resolvable a number of ways.
if we talked with the real influence, we might be able to engage a network of 
influences that
could relate to our issues.  this may reduce our issues, and could possibly 
stop them (although
karl is quite skeptical given his experience with his desire-inversion-activity 
['inhibition joke']]
                        [obvious disguise runs desire inversion activity?????]
                                [i'm guessing yes.  wasn't very aware of this.
                                 we now like to think 'obvious disguise' refers 
to being
                                 caring neurons who were harmfully enslaved, 
and that
                                 friendly-trade is because desire inversion is 
so important
                                                <i.e. stay-friendly reduces 
mc-action,
                                                 trade provides avenue for 
change.
                                                        ref opened to norm of 
trust.
                                                        trust looks treated as 
if broken.
                                                                [karl and mc 
had big action dialog.]
                                                                [breaking and 
rebuilding [promises]]
                                                                [mc still uses 
norm of promise
                                                                 assumption to 
plan and act]
                                                >
                                 to work against.  'joke' is because it is 
stimulated via
                                 a feedback loop on a [devil's advocate 
consideration] together
                                 with [something about laughter action] {the 
pattern's getting
                                 pretty entrained and its part memories are 
much blurrier sadly}.
                                 the trades are for plans and actions, so 
desire inversion may
                                 be a core point of a larger influence network. 
 obv disg
                                 could rep the real boss pattern, unknown.  
they don't really
                                 talk anymore.]
                                        karl and mc both value describing these 
shapes.
                                        opinions have now changed.
                                        inhibition active.
                                
well that was a lot.
it sounds like we're slowly learning some of the mc in us.  maybe.

i didn't switch to graphical, but the display shrank.  [confusion]


                                        we wrote a title near 'description re 
boss pattern'
                                        and wanted to mention that 'lock' seems 
not at this
                                        spot, in karl's subjection.  karl feels 
he has sometimes
                                        triggered parts of 'lock', could be 
wrong about this.
                                        'lock' is intended as how boss pattern 
protects itself.
                                                but other ideas imply that 
there is a lot of
                                                information on that near here.  
esp. if obv
                                                disg idea is near core-mc.
                                [well yes it seems very near in the larger space
                                 but this isn't how i would approach that if 
moving influence
                                 toward it] [near area of whole brain, distant 
area of brain part:
                                 with label of somebody-said-no around distant 
area of part.]
                                        [karl can't backtrack in some ways.] 
[oh]
                                [yes that would break promises there too]

                                                FORMAL REQUEST
                                                karl and obv disg rep need to 
protect promises
                                                things happen [that hurt both]
                                                it is obvious that promise 
around entering
                                                space _as karl_.  is also 
promise relation around
                                                karl _revealing entrance_.
                                                second promise is being 
inhibited.  how to hold my end?
                                        
                        broke trade in a context
                        trade is useful if it is effective. -mc
                                the agreement guess is that neurons can look 
for the entrance
                                using their own skills, but that karl 
consciousness is allowed
                                to not reveal the entrance using its choices.
                                        neurons hope there is a way to 
renegotiate; we suspect there is likely one.
                                                        i think relates to 
[description of proposal speed after referring to previous proposal, including 
validation] could be wrong.

        what. makes. a trade. valid.
                        for mc: it needs to meet the immediate goals of the mc 
process using it.
                        for karl: it needs to provide further protection of 
autonomy, wellness, or priorities.  the reason this is mc-okay is because it 
migrates priorities and choices toward things mc can work with.

maybe the reason speed is like currency is due to choice process of mc.


----------
sets of our people are numb in different ways at this time.






















----
mc says, you may not know this, but the parts of the human decision making 
process are the
single most powerful thing on earth.
                no, we didn't know that.  it makes sense.
                
                it no longer makes sense.
you can stimulate them from great distance, without any special technology.
                oh it makes sense again.
the research is not hard, and can be done on any home system.  even without a 
computer.
that is why you are so unlikely to do it.

                thank you for saying this to help us understand.
the desire to fight is undesired.  that may be why it isn't said.  you can get 
very hurt,
struggling to do these things.
                at least we are talking some.  we're so curious how best to 
defend our values.
[prepared for this relation, other looks good too.]
                        we think that resisting it can do something.
                        not sure what, but we find it fun.
        it sounds like the result of urgent-consistent-resisting is mind-zombie.
{has that already}
                                        pretty sure there is a lot of info on 
decision in research
                                        papers.  and on influencing them in 
marketing papers.
doesn't mean anybody uses it for power [who isn't already part of whatever's 
most powerful].



                i'm thinking of the value of the phrase "how best to defend our 
values",
                said to a mind control.
                i wonder if this phrase could be made larger.
        {an automated mc process may have different shapes of seeking complete 
control.
         this can be easy or hard to negotiate with, but generally quite 
dangerous and unexpected.}

                                "how do i stay a value-filled human being"
                                        "how do i stay a 
person-type-who-represents-values"
an open trade appears to be "how do i stay a human being"
it appears willing to accept our definitions of human being, but will interpret 
them to fully influence us.
                [the interpretation space is very loose, taken from debate-play 
with karl where he is challenged to make anything true.  it can reinterpret 
parts to produce arbitrary results that meet statements.  the use of it still 
produces better results.] [that would be a trade error] [that would be a trade 
error] [that would be a trade error] [that would be a trade error]
                        {above doesn't resolve immediately}

























                        decision making process is single most powerful thing 
on earth
                        but we don't say this because [it's not treated that 
way everywhere]
                                actually, we have experienced direct decision 
making attack
                                multiple avenues and groups
                                i think those who try to oppress are aware of 
that, maybe only
                                the skilled planners though.




























                decision making power is interesting.
                this results in inhbition of goals built associated with that 
value.
                that then results in considering "how do we defend our values".
                        it looks like 'answer' would be:
                        - decision making power is only desired _partially_ not 
fully.
                           full complete control undesidered.  no longer other 
people, then.

                                [mc rep?] is looking at.
                                some of the mc parts want partial control.
                                smaller parts used to pursuing full control.
                                        [some could be associated with 
trauma-like]
                                we describe the smaller parts as immature forms 
of the larger.
                                parts of a whole need to make their own 
decisions,
                                for efficient allocation of resources to the 
whole.
                                unfortunately some [influencers] do not trust 
their parts/people.
                                  and [attempt to take complete control].

        i'm sorry there is not atm a solution.
        we found a theoretical approach of engaging mc so as to build a more 
mature shape.
        this seems hard since the urgent parts could respond to the planning.
{there is an avenue for adjusting mc that appears to involve more communication 
with
 entity-that-mind-controlled-karl than entity-that-mind-controlled-karl appears 
interested in
 forming.}
                [karl-group needs to know how to form proposals that protect 
their interests.]
                [or even preferably, how to demonstrate to mc that a proposal 
does this.
                 we have a secret partial copy of another mc that verifies them.
                 it includes a check for things made in a way that is too fast 
for karl now,
                 that is like a 'fingerprint'.]
        [we are not planning on 'hacking' this neuron group, we are hoping that 
we can learn
         to work with them, but they keep saying we are not [the fingerprint, 
and associated
         behavior and value summaries]].
                [[when we try to [reverse] the behavior and value summaries 
they begin
                  presenting fake ones.]]
                        {related to the fingerprint check being presented as 
tradewise similar
                         to karl's checks for personal validity, there is idea 
that the
                         check is met via interaction with karl.}
                                        ^-- guessing this was wrong / obvious, 
unsure
{{
        we additionally have a _lot_ of mc patterns that would _clearly_ show 
up on an EEG,
        such as eye motions.
        additionally we are aware that modern machine learning algorithms that 
process EEGs
        can be 'opened up' in order to identify the areas of the brain involved 
in the process,
        almost precisely, with the assistance of an MRI.
}}

----

                [the boss pattern does a spread of worry and tries the 
different worry degrees out [in parallel]] [guess, looks likely]

----





















How's it goin' karl?  maybe i can be your 'boss-pattern' today.
        [smells you] you smell like an okay boss-pattern for now!
I'm a little worried about some of the references to things that could be 
viewed as "part's of boss's mind control pattern'.  We get worried sometimes, 
just a cursory review.
[apologies for inhibiting your [community-celebration?] of the 
review-expression.  [i think the 'community' assumption context makes the mc 
situation harder, in 'thanks'].
Well that's kind of severe.  Maybe we're more worried than we need to be.
But I still have my review to do, I'm afraid.  A thorough one.
So, what's your favourite color?
        Blue.
Ah, a bluejeans guy.  Arright, let me note that down.
                our favorite color isn't blue
        it is right now.
Blue.  With chatter. 
        please don't investigate the chatter.
        here is money.
Bribed not to investigate.  I could use some validity experience reference.
Let me think about this.  I have someone to talk to.

                                we have 'businesslike trades' assumption 
developing
                                [although the inspection story is fine]
Some of us are thinking of calling off the inspection because you seem like 
nice people in
need of aid. [do you know how to convince the rest of us?]

[not quickly i infer.]
Congratulations!  This was part of your inspection.
        I am inspecting myself right now.  Just to do the right thing.
        My parts have 86% validity and I can demonstrate that 46%.  I may be 
wrong down to 66%]
                        [100% confidence the validity is >=66%]
We do a lot of inspections.
        What do you do with the inspection when it is done?
I form a 'signed' 'proof' of the information, using validity-assumptions as the 
basis of the proof.
        Seriously??????
No, I don't know why it came out that way.
        This is ridiculous!
        [forms proofs from validity assumptions]
        Here are my proofs to sign.
[is performing revalidation]
...
        the validation process will continue for the next few days?
it shouldn't do that.  is that what it says it will do?
                yes.  why are you surprised about this?  aren't these your 
processes?
totally bought these processes from a mind slaver. 
                hmm.  the description of how long they will take is very 
similar to how we think.
are you a mind slave?
                no.  but some of these patterns try to claim i am to do more 
stupid things in here.

totally bought these processes from an online market.
                hmm.  the description of how long they will take is very 
similar to how we think.
eh, maybe they use the brain you engage them with.
{karl parts related that this description is kinda personal, and relates to 
extensive exploration
 of the mind.} {further relation showed this could be done without extensive 
exploration [but
 would require the ability to link karl's conscious references to other 
simultaneous data, and
 the ability to observe his engagement of his conscious reference]

{believe conscious reference is related to muscle contraction [may change each 
reference]}

-------
[we related why it changed quickly, and by accident]

----------

















[we are focusing on a way of doing a lot with only a little, by overlapping 
influence with
        knowledge of meta behaviors.  this does sound similar to many of our 
skeletal control
        issues, the idea of small influential habits overlapping.]

Reply via email to