Hi Dear Mr or Mrs. X i was so busy this week (my final exam’s week), i couldn't get a good look at your article.but i'll look into your ideas and solutions in detail.It's nice to have people share ideas like that, and I can help. Have a nice day
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ <[email protected]> 23 Ocak 2022 Pazar saat 20:34 tarihinde yazdı: > Dear Cypherpunks, > > We all know that Bitcoin and blockchain in general came with a lot of hype > and many expectations - however, it didn't change much in the degree of our > sovereignty as individuals. It didn't materialise our dreams of human society > made of free, sovereign individuals, just as the Internet didn't. > The root of the problem was not addressed by neither of mentioned inventions. > The root of the problem is simple, very simple indeed - in every system, > social or technological, the value of a human being is always only RELATIVE > to other elements of the system. Look at the Internet - we are surveilled and > manipulated in a way that extracts value out of us, we are monetised. Look at > Bitcoin - a handful of early adopters captured every vital element of this > system, from miners to exchanges, and extracts value from Bitcoin > users-speculators just like a casino monetises the greed of its custiomers. > Governments, banking sector, corporations, they all share one common > characteristic - they monetise human beings, because by "monetisation" we > mean value extraction. In none of those systems is a human life inherently, > absolutely valuable - only relatively; some lives are more valuable, because > they own the skills that are supportive for monetisation of others. We live > in a pyramid of slavery since the dawn of time. > But what if there was a way, a system, that distributes value almost equally > to every human being? We can't expect that humans would create such a system. > We are greedy by nature. But maybe we could build an algorithm that would > somehow distribute wealth to humans impartially? Just as in other systems > having money, having hashing power, having influence or whatever is an > investment that yields returns, here an "investment" would be basically being > human. It would be like Bitcoin, just each block reward would go to all > humans that want it, equally. > This reality can be closer than one might think. I have prepared a detailed > design of such a protocol and I believe it to be the first to solve the > Decentralised Identity Trilemma (http://maciek.blog/dit/). I've sent it to > many people who I thought could be interested in my proposition - the > response was a deafening silence, not even a single person did contact me > back. Nobody believes in anything anymore but money. However, I hope that > there are few idealists here that would like to read my proposition and, if > they suspect it to be of any value, help me with exposing it to proper > audience, since I have no voice of my own and we live in times when the > importance of ideas is superseded by the fame of their authors. I don't want > anything more. > Here's my proposition: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ir3gbumhgzc8khy/Themis%20-%20algorithmic%20equality.pdf?dl=0 > -- > Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox.
