On 5/14/22, punk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2022 05:37:23 -0400 > "Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 13, 2022, 11:11 PM punk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 13 May 2022 20:55:29 -0400 >> > Karl Semich <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > > Having an onchain mail protocol is half the battle. >> > >> > >> > only NSA fascists want 'onchain mail'. >> > >> >> You mean cleartext mail :) > > > any kind of 'blockchain' mail or anything 'blockchain' in general. 99% > of > 'blockchains' are for surveillance and worse.
what kind of blockchains have you run into? i was a little confused when i posted the main thing, but basically it's possible to configure a blockchain (via software development) to meet personal requirements of various cryptographic bounds, including anonymity and privacy. that doesn't mean that anybody _does_ that. it's kinda like money, it makes it work super well and then somebody paves over your garden and murders your family
