Expert testimony is often decisive. The standard governing its admissibility is therefore critically important.
For years, federal practitioners have referred to that standard as the " *Daubert*" standard, for the Supreme Court's seminal decision in *Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals*, 509U.S. 579 (1993). https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/trials-appeals-compensation/1207626/don39t-say-daubert-reviving-rule-702?email_access=on
