> technical bores to them since c-punks was a list for discussing the sort of > societal changes PKI enabled - ' cryptoanarchism ' in his word. > He interpreted Hughes ' We write code ' imperative as broadly as possible > where ' code ' meant free-speech as well as working hardware at the
PKI is only established via software code. Sufficient software code has not yet happened to normalise user-based PKI; it can therefore be highly relevant. The free speech part of "code" to me means cryptographically-processed messages. These messages we are exchanging are not received and sent cryptographically-processed by us.
