On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:24:57 +0000
Peter Fairbrother <[email protected]> quoted:
> "Anyone, from the most clueless amateur to the best cryptographer, can
> create an algorithm that he himself can't break. It's not even hard.
> What is hard is creating an algorithm that no one else can break, even
> after years of analysis. And the only way to prove that is to subject
> the algorithm to years of analysis by the best cryptographers around."
>
so called 'peer review' doesn't *prove* that all.
1) an algorithm that no one else can break
2) the only way to prove that is to subject the algorithm to years of analysis
by the best cryptographers around
laughably dishonest and idiotic lie. The only thing that 2) 'proves' is
that those people couldn't break the system, or didn't want to, or didn't
publish their actual results. It doesn't prove that it hasn't been broken by,
you know, the 'intelligence' 'community' mafia.
so guess what, jakobo shneir 'law' is not a 'law' at all - it's a piece
of propaganda coming from a pentagon jew.
