On 9/13/23, mailbombbin <[email protected]> wrote: > [so what does it mean if i proved it false, and it is true? > you didn’t prove it false — you proved that it is a contradiction > with the logic system. it’s — > > so it’s true, isn’t it true? > no, because it’s a contradiction, it is actually provable (see much > earlier post), but it’s not logically valid one way or another
nono look um it’s not logically valid, so a proof of it is invalid. godel was right > > couldn’t i say something like “this statement cannot be proven to > contradict with the system of logic” or its inverse or something? >
