On 9/13/23, mailbombbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> the reason sentences cannot assert their own provability is that only
> true things are interesting, and facts are rooted in reality. true
note: false things are interesting too, they define true exclusions
> information stems from reality -- the patterns of reality define what
> is logically true. [that's how i defined my inherent logic]
> [some observation that large truths about reality can be derived
> philosophically; one might say when we look for new rules of logic, we
> look to derive what we can further infer from reality]
>

Reply via email to