Mich. Panel Sinks Inventor's Atty Malpractice Appeal
<https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1890519?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-10-17&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=15>

By Hannah Albarazi

A Michigan appellate panel has held that the inventor of a swim training
device did not prove he would have built a successful custom swim paddle
business had his attorney secured him a patent, affirming the dismissal of
a legal malpractice suit against the inventor's patent attorney and firm.

 Opinion attached | Read full article »
<https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1890519?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-10-17&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=15>
 | Save to favorites »
<https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1890519?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-10-17&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=15>

Reply via email to