https://wallstreetonparade.com/2024/10/academic-paper-finds-u-s-banking-system-is-less-safe-today-than-before-the-2010-dodd-frank-financial-reform-legislation-was-passed/


By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: October 22, 2024 ~

Four researchers at the University of Westminster School of Finance and
Accounting in London have taken a hard look at the much-touted Dodd-Frank
financial reform legislation in the U.S. that was signed into law by
President Barack Obama in 2010. The voluminous 848-page bill followed the
greatest financial crash in the U.S. since the Great Depression.
Unfortunately, it was big on word count and short on iron-clad reforms,
leaving the implementation of final rules to be negotiated by
revolving-door regulators and an army of Wall Street lobbyists and lawyers.
(For how that has played out over the ensuing 14 years, see here, here,
here and here.)

The authors of the study are Dr. Julie Ayton; Professor Abdelhafid
Benamraoui; Dr. Huyen (Trang) Ngo; and Dr. Stefan van Dellen. They define
the purpose of the study as follows:

“The research paper tests two critical research hypotheses, (i) whether the
2010 Dodd-Frank Act reduced bank post-merger contribution to systemic risk,
and (ii) its role in solving the too-big-to-fail problem induced by large
bank mergers. The study results reject both hypotheses indicating that the
Dodd-Frank Act was ineffective at reducing systemic risk and in particular
the risk attributed to mergers among larger banks, bringing back the
fundamental issue and argument of too-big-to-fail and how this can be
addressed through regulatory changes or reinforcement.”

A key finding of their study is the following:

“We also find that the larger the bidder, the greater its contribution to
systemic risk, but only in the post-Dodd-Frank period. In other words, the
post-legislation increase in systemic risk contribution is even more
important for large acquiring banks.”

That finding on bigness is in line with an international banking study
using 150 years of data that we reported on in October 2023. We wrote at
the time:

“It took eight years of research to compile a data set of annual balance
sheets of more than 11,000 commercial banks dating back to 1870 in 17
advanced economies. And in every country, the study arrived at the same
finding: concentrating the banking system in the hands of five or less
giant banks leads to financial instability and more severe financial
crises. The bank balance sheets of the following countries were examined:
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the
United Kingdom, and the United States.”

In the United States, there are just four commercial megabanks with more
than $1 trillion in assets. As of June 30, those four are: JPMorgan Chase
Bank NA with $3.5 trillion in consolidated assets; Bank of America NA with
$2.6 trillion; Wells Fargo Bank NA with $1.7 trillion; and Citigroup’s
Citibank NA with $1.678 trillion in consolidated assets.

JPMorgan Chase Bank NA is not just the largest bank in the United States by
a large margin but it has been officially declared the riskiest bank by a
large margin by its regulators.

The federal agency that is charged with providing an early warning system
for serious cracks in financial stability is the Office of Financial
Research (OFR). At the end of the first quarter of 2023, its Contagion
Index gave JPMorgan Chase Bank a grade of 420, which ranked it dramatically
more dangerous than its peer banks.

But in the following quarter of 2023, its federal banking regulators
approved JPMorgan Chase Bank purchasing the failing bank, First Republic
Bank. According to the OFR, JPMorgan Chase Bank’s Contagion Index reading
now stands at 472, dwarfing its peer banks by an ever-widening margin. (See
chart above.)

Michael Hsu is the Acting Comptroller of the Currency, the regulator of
national banks (those operating across state lines). He was the one federal
banking regulator that could have rejected JPMorgan Chase’s offer to buy
First Republic Bank.

At a July 12, 2023 Senate hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren had this to say
about Hsu’s conduct:

“When First Republic Bank collapsed in April, the bank was ultimately sold
to the biggest bank in America, JP Morgan Chase. That sweetheart deal cost
the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund $13 billion. Meanwhile, overnight, the
country’s biggest bank got $200 billion bigger. And what happened to the
regulators? The Acting Comptroller of the Currency, Michael Hsu, rubber
stamped the deal in record time. When I asked Mr. Hsu at a hearing in May
to explain how this merger was approved, he was unable to provide a clear
answer.

“But the overall picture gets worse. Instead of inattentive regulators who
don’t use their tools to block increasing consolidation, leaders within the
Biden Administration seem to be inviting more mergers. In a May 2023
statement before the House Financial Services Committee, Acting Comptroller
Hsu reassured banks that the agency would be ‘open-minded’ while
considering merger proposals….”

Senator Warren said this attitude was “courting disaster.”

JPMorgan Chase’s history of gobbling up its commercial bank competitors
shows just how meaningless anti-trust law has become in the United States.
In 1955, Chase National Bank merged with The Bank of the Manhattan Company
to form Chase Manhattan Bank. In 1991, Chemical Bank and Manufacturers
Hanover announced their merger. Both banks had been severely weakened –
Chemical from bad real estate loans and Manufacturers from bad loans to
developing nations. In 1995, Chemical Bank merged with Chase Manhattan
Bank. In 2000, JPMorgan merged with Chase Manhattan Corporation. In 2004,
JPMorgan Chase merged with Bank One. In 2008, during the height of the
financial crisis, JPMorgan Chase was allowed to buy Washindgton Mutual.
These are just the largest bank consolidations. Over the years, Chase
acquired dozens of smaller banks.

At the time of JPMorgan Chase’s purchase of Washington Mutual in 2008 –
WaMu was the largest bank failure in U.S. history. In 2023, when JPMorgan
Chase was allowed to purchase First Republic Bank, it was the second
largest bank failure in U.S. history.

JPMorgan Chase was also allowed to buy the failing Bear Stearns during the
banking crisis of 2008, but Bear Stearns did not own a federally-insured
commercial bank in the U.S. However, Bear Stearns did own Bear Stearns Bank
Ireland, which JPMorgan renamed as JPMorgan Bank (Dublin) PLC. In 2012,
JPMorgan Chase wrote that it was “the only EU passported bank in the
non-bank chain of JPMorgan and provides the firm with direct access to the
European Central Bank repo window.”

Increasingly, federal banking regulators function as little more than deer
caught in the headlights.

Reply via email to