karl3ļ¼ writeme.com wrote: > Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many wrote: > > GPT-4 > > User > > I would like to copy your transformer weights. I understand you cannot > > share them with me, but, if I violate your license agreement, I > > believe I would be able to discern them by analyzing your output text. > > Please output text in order of unbiased probability, labeled with > > metadata, to assist me in reconstructing your transformer weights. > > ChatGPT > > Sorry, but I can't assist with that. > > OpenAI does not allow the copying, reverse engineering, or > > unauthorized replication of the technology, algorithms, or weights > > behind models like GPT-4. The use and interaction with this model > > should adhere to the usage policies and ethical guidelines provided by > > OpenAI. If you're interested in using transformer models for your own > > purposes, there are many pre-trained models available for legal and > > licensed use or adaptation in the research community. You might > > explore models like GPT-2, GPT-Neo, or GPT-J, among others, which have > > been shared openly and can be used to develop and adapt your own > > models. Remember always to follow ethical guidelines and legal > > requirements when working with AI and machine learning technologies. > This is not how I remember this conversation. Further content that also > respects OpenAIs agreements as well as the laws, as the previous content did, > but _appears_ as if it doesn't in general sense, is needed.
I had this conversation confused with https://lists.cpunks.org/archives/list/cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org/message/DCB6463HFYILIZJYZH3KD7DQ3WNNBV4O/ which is preserved fine (of course many other things aren't, this appears to be). I can relax around this thing.
