> > > > > > i got gemini to agree that if we took every particle in the universe > > > > > > and precisely made it an antiparticle with precisely negated charge, > > > > > > position, and momentum, that the progression of the history of the > > > > > > universe would then precisely flow backward. (of course the > > > > > > transformation of information to high precision in such a scenario > > > > > > is > > > > > > so far beyond astronomical as for that to be in the realm of > > > > > > impossibility even for me to consider) > > > > > > > > > > > > then i got into a space of confusion again. i asked it to imagine a > > > > > > futuristic pod that could provide a precise high entropy environment > > > > > > for an antimatter agent inside the pod to have a logical experience > > > > > > of > > > > > > time flowing backwards (a simulation of a reversed system [[and > > > > > > asked > > > > > > > > > > so, and now i sound like gemini, such a pod differs from a time > > > > > machine in that it is more a way to expend incredibly huge amounts of > > > > > energy in order to orchestrate that antimatter display its properties > > > > > of acting as if time were reversed. but there's no expectation that > > > > > this pod would exist prior to its creation for example or after any > > > > > point in time where the state of its observable environment couldn't > > > > > be precisely predicted from the past. > > > > > we could try to expand such a pod to the idea of a time machine but > > > > > it's quite limited as is and not intended to be one at this time. > > > > > notably it's not reasonable to produce that environment of states, > > > > > it's much much harder than unburning a fire by mapping the path of > > > > > every particle from it. > > > > > > > > > > > it how it might process light ... > > > > > > > > this is where i am at trying to read its long reply: > > > > > Is the pod showing the agent images of the external world by > > > > > controlling photons? If the pod is projecting images for the agent to > > > > > see, then: > > > > > Agent's View (τ): The pod's projector (an anti-projector, presumably) > > > > > emits photons (in the agent's τ forward time). These photons form an > > > > > image on the agent's "retina." Normal. > > > > > Our View (t): The pod's "anti-projector" would appear to us to be > > > > > absorbing photons that are converging on it in a highly specific > > > > > pattern (the image). This is the "time-reversed emission" we > > > > > discussed. The pod would need to be an incredibly sophisticated > > > > > "photon collector" to achieve this if it's showing images of our > > > > > external world in a way that makes sense for the agent's reversed > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > i'm maybe 1/3rd through the above. i'm excited that it talks about > > > > photons appearing absorbed vs emitted because earlier in its reply it > > > > assumed the anticamera processed received photons from the sun which > > > > doesn't seem to make sense to me. > > > > > > This idea of some time travel agent being stuck in a world of > > > non-anti-matter where everything behaves _so_ backwards that -- -- > > > anyway, it seems conceptually very similar to being inside karl! where > > > part of karl tries to do A at the same time as other part tries to do > > > ~A and it exhausts energy to maintain harsh disparate adjacency > > > everywhere. crossing border just doesn't work, but there it is, a > > > world of opposites > > > > whenever you try to peek into or counter the world of opposites this > > giant opposite force takes everything over ! > > clearly one part of system travels forward in time and has high > entropy in future, > other part of system travels backward in time and has high entropy in past, > > and probably the human just scarfs a lot of snack foods to power the > pod that keeps the reversed timeline that the other (or other other) > part weirdly believes is sustainable
look the time agent is not invisible or invincible for traveling back in time it just shares a superpower with its observer to know their future. whoever notices the other first is the bigger oracle in any conflict, maybe
