Quoting William Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Faustine sez:
> [David Friedman has published . . .]
> > Nothing good enough to get mentioned at NBER, the
> > veritable gold standard
> > (if
> > you'll allow) of academic research in economics.
> 
> 5 minutes of time at econlit (the standard index
> of economics literature) produces tens of 
> papers by David Friedman.  A sample of the 
> places of publication:
> 
> Journal of Law and Economics (more than once)
> Journal of Political Economy (more than once)
> American Economic Review
> 
> AER is usually considered the top economics 
> journal.  JPE is in everyone's top 5 and it
> would be reasonable to rank it second behind
> AER. 


I'm sure you know that writing a tiny response or comment in reply to someone 
else's article isn't the same as having your own research published there. 
Personally I wouldn't expect to get the same cachet from it as if I'd done 
anything substantial. Seems a little like disingenuous padding to me.


 JLE is the top journal in "law and 
> economics" which is Friedman's field.
> 
> It is difficult to reconcile 
> D Friedman's publication record with the claim
> that he is not a good economist.

I still find it unimpressive. I also find what I've read so far unimpressive: 
the tone is just a tad too slack, as if he's writing for people who already 
agree with him. Frankly, I know for a fact there's no way my professors would 
even let me turn them in as papers. I find it hard to see how you can call it 
research at all, it's partisan theorizing at best. 

In contrast, I read a paper last night by Michael Lipton, "The State-Market 
Dilemma, Civil Society, and Structural Adjustment". It used data in a totally 
unobtrusive way--and I came away from it feeling like I really learned 
something conceptually useful, regardless of whether I ultimately agreed with 
its conclusions. I just wasn't getting this sense from the Friedman essays. 

Do you really mean to say you think Friedman is up to NBER standards? Maybe I 
just haven't read the right thing yet; let me know what you think his best 
stuff is and I'll give it a shot.


> -- Bill Vogt
>    Carnegie Mellon University
>    NBER


For what it's worth, I liked your work MUCH better. 

~Faustine.



****

'We live in a century in which obscurity protects better than the law--and 
reassures more than innocence can.' Antoine Rivarol (1753-1801). 

Reply via email to