I think this books has been discussed over here. This is from CU Digest.

Mark

Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 07:50:20 -0800
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Rob Slade, doting grandpa of Ryan and Trevor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: File 8--REVIEW: "Database Nation", Simson Garfinkel

BKDBSNTN.RVW   20000201

"Database Nation", Simson Garfinkel, 2000, 1-56592-653-6,
U$24.95/C$36.95
%A   Simson Garfinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%C   103 Morris Street, Suite A, Sebastopol, CA   95472
%D   2000
%G   1-56592-653-6
%I   O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
%O   U$24.95/C$36.95 800-998-9938 fax: 707-829-0104 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%P   312 p.
%T   "Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century"

This is a very hard book to define.  The title would indicate that it
is a technical work, but databases do not figure either centrally or
prominently in the work, and, while the technical material is not
wrong, it is not always either significant or advanced.  The subtitle,
plus the dust jacket comments, plus the definition of privacy as
"fundamentally about the power of the individual" (p. 5), would
indicate that this is a political text.  Indeed, the central
recommendation of the book is that the US government should promulgate
legislation regarding privacy.  (This proposal, plus the very strong
focus upon the situation and history of the United States will
seriously limit the interest that the volume might have for those
outside the US.)

Chapter one starts out with a number of rather nasty scenarios, but
the problems appear to refer more to bad design than they do to
privacy as such.  Indeed, this foreshadows the content of the book as
a whole, since the technical material, when it does appear, points out
shoddy engineering and insufficient planning rather than attacks on
confidentiality.  (On the other hand, as a harangue against poor
preparation the work presents some excellent examples.)  The statement
that "unrestrained technology ends privacy" is made somewhat baldly.
Since the political definition of privacy previously cited is the only
one given in the book this is almost true by definition, but it is, as
such, uninteresting.  No support is made to give the assertion any
other depth.

The penultimate section of the opening chapter talks about opposing
informational intrusions, but neither there nor at the few other
points in the book that touch on the subject are we given a serious
discussion of how this might be done.  The last section is entitled
"Why This Book" and makes reference to the wake up call that "Silent
Spring" was for the environmental movement.  However, the case being
made against technology as necessarily the enemy of privacy would not
seem to justify this position.

Chapter two is a history of US record keeping and credit reporting,
and the problems reported generally relate to authentication and
integrity.  One interesting point is that Garfinkel appears to be
strongly in favour of a national combined database for the United
States, a proposal that gives most other privacy analysts hives.
Various problems with biometric systems are reviewed (quite well) in
chapter three, but although the fact that UPS collects digitized
signatures is mentioned, the point is weakened (as in a number of
other areas of the book) by not including the proposed sale of this
database.  Automatic data collection is discussed, but the proposed
alternatives are very weak, in chapter four.  Chapter five looks at
satellite, video, and other sensors.  Medical records, and the special
problems thereof, are covered in chapter six.  The ideas of David
Brin's "The Transparent Society" (cf. BKTRASOC.RVW) are opposed here
(as in some other sections of the text), but the suggested alternative
sounds very much like the "reciprocal openness" that Brin proposes.
Chapter seven reviews direct marketing.  Ownership of personal
information is discussed in chapter eight, with a heavy emphasis on
the debate over genetic data.  A long overview of terrorism is
followed by a brief, but very intense, examination of surveillance in
chapter nine.  (This includes a rather forced look at brain mapping as
a forerunner of mind reading.)  Chapter ten raises various points in
respect of artificial intelligence and agent technology, but is
confusing to follow.  A call is made for more legislation in regard to
privacy in chapter eleven.  As well, Garfinkel tries to argue that
technology is *not* privacy neutral, but the example used does not
support the point: again we are looking at a clear case of poor
design.

Most of the writing is good, but there are numerous small and sloppy
errors that are annoying.  Sentences are misplaced, anecdotes are
started but not finished, and arguments are not followed to
completion.  Garfinkel strives for balance in the material presented,
but his own points seem weak.  This debility is not a function of
fairness, though.  For instance, in chapter nine a table seems to
clearly indicate that wiretaps play no role in counterterrorism, but
this point is never pursued in the text.

As far as making the case that privacy is under attack, other works
seem to have done a better job.  "The Electronic Privacy Papers"
(cf. BKELPRPA.RVW), for example, presents far more evidence of US
government action against privacy.  "Privacy on the Line"
(cf. BKPRIVLN.RVW) gives a better background, although it doesn't
provide much in the way of direction.  "Technology and Privacy"
(cf. BKTCHPRV.RVW) is more advanced and has the benefit of an
international overview.  "The Transparent Society," previously
mentioned, not only provides a good framework, but its counter-
intuitive reversal of perspective ensures a thorough analysis.

"Database Nation" is certainly readable and probably thought-
provoking.  It may not, however, be the book that the promotion is
making it out to be.

copyright Robert M. Slade, 2000   BKDBSNTN.RVW   20000201


Reply via email to