X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As far as the raid goes, I support it. A 6-year-old child belongs
> with his father or mother. The uncles and cousins had no standing,
> period.
You're a fucking idiot. [Sadly, I am beginning to be used to it.] A human
being doesn't belong to anybody else, unless he enters into a contract to
those terms. A 6-years-old child is quite capable of knowing what he wants.
[Hell, my 7-months-old daughter knows what she wants.] Not knowing that Tim
May is ranting on cypherpunks doesn't disqualify a human being from owning
himself.
That being said, I am an anarchist. I don't want the state to exist at all -
neither to defend the child, nor to harm him. Yes, in normal circumstances,
the father's rights come prior to those of any other relatives. However, in
this case, it is my understanding that the child has expressed his will to
remain in the US. No further debate is necessary.
Mark
