X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Just so you know, I believe the moral thing for Elian's father to
> have done was to hire some skilled people--perhaps ex-Spetsnaz--and
> go in to the Lorenzo and Maryslices home and taken Elian. Once Elian
> was safely out of the house, execute all those complicit in his
> kidnapping.

Oh, so now Tim not only is no longer an anarchist, he's not even a
libertarian. Tim has just become a leftist nihilist, advocating violation of
other people's rights. Sad...

> However, our society makes this an untenable option. Government has
> decreed that only they may use force, that only they may rescue
> kidnapped children.
>
> Given us realities, I would then say--were it my child--to government
> the following:

This is bullshit. "Given our realities, the best I can do is to lobby the
government for a larger piece of pie". This is what distinguishes principled
people from the rest: some of us consider *wrong* to advocate violation of
rights, no matter how expedient it is.

> "This uncle and his daughter do not have a right to hold my son. He
> is six years old. He can express opinions about Hot Wheels and hot
> dogs and Disney World, but he does not know a single thing about
> politics.

Which is completely irrelevant. The kid hasn't said "I want to live in
capitalism"; he just said "I want to live here". His reasons are
unimportant.

> Now according to our Romanian One True Believer, anyone who bows to
> the "monopoly on force" de facto system is a communist, is not a true
> believer, etc.

Anybody who advocates violation of people's rights - no matter the "higher
goal" invoked - is a socialist, yes.

> I'm tempted to hire some folks in Bucharest to go and seize Marcel's
> 7-year-old daughter, hold her for a few weeks, ply her with toys and
> candy and similar inducements, and then video tape record her saying
> she really does want to be given asylum in some nice Arabic country.
> Marcel can then remember his words about young children have the
> right to make life-changing choices as his daughter is turned into a
> child concubine in one of the satrapies in the sands.

As I said, violation of people's rights. And you somehow consider this an
argument... [Not to mention lying a small child (if that were possible, see
next <g>), not to mention lack of reading skills: it's seven MONTHS old.]

Here's hope that this is not the real Tim May, but some government puppet...

Mark



Reply via email to