No, the procmail recipe doesn't do any clever replying. Your suggestion
might be useful if the idea takes off. So far, it's not at all clear
that the idea will take off -- signups on the new filtering version
of the list have not been overwhelming -- which isn't that surprising,
really.
Your mutt hook looks cool, by the way.
-Bill
>
> Bill,
> does your 'procmail recipe' reply with a description on why the mail bounced?
> probably those nodes which receive the mail from the user should
> bounce/filter, and not those leaf nodes that deliver to the users.
>
> All,
> If you use mutt, just add those send-hooks to your ~/.muttrc:
>
> send-hook . unmy_hdr Approved
> send-hook ".*cypherpunks@.*" my_hdr Approved: CPUNK
>
> --
> so much entropy, so little time
>
