At 02:37 AM 7/18/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>two advantages:
>
>a) more encrypted traffic on the web.

With known plaintext...

>b) some people might want to read cypherpunks without the intermediate
>parties being aware of the fact (I know companies that monitor e-mail).

If that's a concern, use the anonymizer (via SSL) + web archive.

>b2) running the encrypted listserver under a different name than
>"cypherpunks" would possibly a good idea for this case.

Any fixed name would get known.








  






Reply via email to