At 11:41 AM -0400 7/26/00, David Honig wrote:
>At 02:11 AM 7/26/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
>>The FBI has said that Carnivore will only be directed at specific
>>targets of a wiretap order.
>>
>>How, then, does it do a damned thing with "anonymous, encrypted
>>communications"?
>>
>>This is just one of many failures in logic.
>
>It helps with traffic analysis.
>

I'm not saying sniffing all the traffic might not help, I'm saying 
that IF the warrant is against a specific party, and they have no 
specific party (or even a specific address), then clearly they will 
get nothing.

But of course the point is that they _won't_ be limiting themselves 
to tapping just a single address covered by a court order.

This was my point. There own rationale for Carnivore tells the story.

They wish to be a mini-NSA.

BTW, expect nothing better from the Reps when they come to power. I 
wouldn't be surprised if they didn't simply cut to the chase and set 
up a unified TLA spy system, combining the NSA and CIA (and perhaps 
DIA, ONI, NRO, etc.) and tightening ties to the FBI.

Why reinvent the wheel with Carnivore installed inside cages at AOL 
and Earthlink when the other agencies are adept at much wider 
sniffing?


--Tim May
-- 
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon"             | black markets, collapse of governments.


Reply via email to