----- Original Message -----
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Jon Roland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 4:02 PM
Subject: [Freenet-chat] Fw: A right must be exercisable in secret


> Excerpted from http://www.constitution.org/ussc/424-001jr.htm
>
> ------------------------
> A right must be exercisable in secret
> Jon Roland
>
> A right is not complete unless it can be exercised in secret, and every
> recognition of a right is a recognition of the right to exercise it in
> secret. The reason for this is to protect the person not just from
> oppressive action by government, but also from private parties and
political
> factions. This means persons have the rights to worship in secret; to
speak
> and publish anonymously and in code; to peaceably assemble in secret; to
> petition anonymously (although a legal representative might need to be
> revealed to pursue the petition); to keep and bear arms in secret
(although
> as militiamen may be required to maintain minimal military arms and other
> equipment); to hold property in secret (although taxable or regulatable
> commodities may be subject to inspection); and make financial transactions
> and contracts in secret (as long as they are not to commit unlawful acts,
> and they may need to be disclosed to be enforced by courts). Therefore,
all
> legislative requirements for disclosure are unconstitutional. Disclosure
may
> only be done through commodity inspection or due process, and then must
meet
> a standard such as probable cause, and may be challenged for cause.
>
> This general right of secrecy, sometimes called privacy, is balanced
against
> the right of persons to know what they need to know to make lawful and law
> enforcement decisions, but the threshold of public need is high. It is
> established in the Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process for
> supporting testimony in criminal cases, in the Fourth Amendment right to
be
> secure in one's premises, effects, and communications subject to a lawful
> search or arrest warrant, and in the Fifth Amendment right to not testify
> against oneself. However, there is one area that, while firmly grounded in
> theory, is not well established in current jurisprudence, and that is the
> right to protect others from unlawful demands for disclosure. The mere
> procedural predicate for such a demand is not sufficient. The disclosure
> demand must be constitutionally authorized. If it is not, one does not
have
> a duty to comply with it, and likely the duty to resist it, especially if
> one has probable cause to expect that disclosure would endanger innocent
> persons.
>
> The basis for all rights is not just an original claim to one's own
> enjoyment, but the social contract, which is very real and which
establishes
> the duty to defend the members of one's society from threats to their
> rights, including one's own, as a member of the society. A duty entails
the
> right to perform the duty, and all of the rights recognized by the
> constitution are based on the duty to exercise such rights in defense of
the
> state and its constitution. The First Amendment may not have mentioned the
> duty to exercise the rights it recognizes, but the Second Amendment does,
> and the duty is implicit in the First as well. That is, we have a duty to
> worship, speak, publish, assemble, and petition in defense of the society.
> That does not mean the right may not also be exercised for one's one
private
> benefit and enjoyment, but there is an implied state power to enforce the
> duty for every right except the rights to think, believe, and worship, and
> there is an enforceable duty to acquire the knowledge and skills needed to
> perform the other duties.
>
> ---------------End of Original Message-----------------
>
> ===================================================================
> Constitution Society, 1731 Howe Av #370, Sacramento, CA 95825
> 916/568-1022, 916/450-7941VM         Date: 08/02/00  Time: 12:02:07
> http://www.constitution.org/     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-chat mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-chat
>
>




Reply via email to