Making NRA Member's Voices Heard

NRA Bylaw Reforms from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

August 1 Neal Knox Special Report -- NRA members' strong
voices are clearly heard in the halls of Congress, but not
necessarily heard in NRA Headquarters.

Or so I'm told in countless letters and phone calls from
members angry or irritated about excessive fundraising
letters, legislative positions, improperly graded political
candidates, instructor certification problems, undelivered hats
and a string of other important and trivial issues.

I've opened one such letter, and received one such call in
just the last half hour.

A call I received last month was from a guy who lives in the
same town as an influential NRA Director; I suggested that
perhaps he should talk to him about the problem.

My caller exploded.  He said he'd been talking to that Director
about the same problem for two years, and though the
Director agreed that the problem could and should be
corrected, nothing has happened.

"Now he refuses to talk about it, saying I should call HQ.  My
anti-gun Congressman pays more attention to me than my
Director does," he fumed.

I told him I was working on something that might solve his
problem.

That "something" is one of the two NRA Bylaws Amendments
that Dr. Bill Davis and I are circulating petitions to put on next
winter's mail ballot.

The first Bylaw Amendment would create representational
government in NRA by modifying the way Directors are
elected.

It calls for 50 of the 75 NRA Directors to be elected for one
year terms by members _within_ their states of residence.

To provide appropriate representation for the states with
larger population, 24 Directors would be elected At Large as
at present, except their terms would be for two years instead
of three, to keep them "closer to the people" (as the Founding
Fathers said about the U.S. House of Representatives).

One Director would continue to be elected each year by all
members at an annual meeting.

The idea of State Directors has been floating around for over
20 years that I know about.

What it would do is assure that most voting members in a
state would be choosing someone that they actually knew.

In every other state, the members of those states would also
be choosing people _they_ knew -- either from their state
association, or the Friends Dinners, or through a grass roots
legislative group, or at the gun shows or at a local range.

That alone would have a whale of an impact on the makeup
of the Board, for at least two thirds of the Directors would
reflect the views of the members of his or her state.

But it would also guarantee that each State Director � who
would be running again the following year -- would pay
careful attention to the reasonable requests of NRA
members, and make sure the NRA staff paid attention.
Congressmen call it "constituent service."

I will guarantee you that if we get the required 500 validated
NRA Voting Member signatures on our petitions by Sept. 1,
the Board will oppose it.

One argument will be that it's too complicated and costly.
Nonsense.  Only minimal changes would be needed in the
ballots and the dBase computer program to count a
candidate's vote from within his state.

Another argument will be that the State Director Bylaw would
result in over-representation of smaller states.  But for
several years the tiny state of Rhode Island -- with probably
the smallest NRA membership per capita of any state -- has
had two Directors.

Over one-third of the larger states, some with an unusually
high percentage of NRA members, have no representation
on the Board.

The other proposed bylaw amendment would provide
reasonable restrictions against NRA employees and
contractors funding, or otherwise being involved in NRA
internal elections (except for employees the Secretary
assigned to help conduct the elections).

The Board will oppose that one, too, for in the last three
election cycles -- when no one except nominees of the
Board-elected Nominating Committee have been elected --
many or most of those elected paid only a small portion (or
none) of the heavy costs of their campaigns.

I have reason to believe that most of the $40,000 or so in
advertisements directing members "Do Not Vote For" certain
people (including me, twice) were paid by NRA vendors and
contractors. I also believe vendors paid most of the cost of
the campaign mailings, flyers and election handouts that may
have cost another $40,000.

I have no reason to doubt that those vendors sincerely like
NRA E.V.P. Wayne LaPierre, who approves their contracts.

But it's worrisome to think that outside commercial interests
may be influencing NRA elections -- and, therefore, NRA
policies.  And I hope I'm wrong.

Putting this difficult-to-enforce Bylaw on the books would at
least make it clear that the membership doesn't want it to
happen.

According to the Bylaws, if Bill and I deliver 500 properly
identified valid signatures of voting members by Sept. 1, we
will also get to write a 500-word statement which will be
printed in the election issue of the NRA magazines, which the
opposing Board can also match.

Approval will require a majority vote of the members voting.
No previous Bylaw amendment opposed by the Board has
been approved.

But I think the members will like these amendments � which
should have the support of every state association, collector
organization and other affiliated member group in every state,
for it will make it possible for them to elect at least one
Director they want.

These Bylaw Amendments would assure that the voices of
the members are heard in the Board meetings -- and in the
Blue Palace on Waples Mill (NRA Headquarters).

To help make it happen, start by pointing your web browser
to
http://www.nealknox.com/nra2001/petitions.
Read our cover letter and both of the petitions, which you can
print out on legal sized paper with a click of the button.  Get
as many voting member signatures -- and NRA identification
numbers -- as you can, and send to Bill at the address
indicated.

                                        Neal Knox

P.S. If you can't download, contact Bill at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and send your snailmail
address.

********************************************************
To begin receiving Neal Knox's bi-monthly newsletter, send a
contribution of $25 or more to The Firearms Coalition, 7771
Sudley Rd. No. 44, Manassas, VA 20109. For current news,
call 1-900-225-3006 (89 cents per minute) or visit
http://www.nealknox.com (free).
************************************************************
For those of you in South Carolina who wish to receive
specific alerts please e-mail request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and/or visit www.scfirearms.org.
************************************************************
What To Do If The Police Come To Confiscate Your Militia
Weapons see  www.2ndamendment.net
For legislative updates contact www.nealknox.com and go to
"Scripts from the Firearms Coalition Legislative Update Line"
***************************************************
The Georgia Sport Shooting Association wants you! A free
shooting events list is published every two weeks. Go to
www.gssa.com and sign up today.
*************************************************

If you received this as a forward and wish to join please send:
E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
message body:    SUBSCRIBE 2nd-Amendment-News

We have had a computer error.  If you want to be removed
send a message to the list administrator, send E-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you know anyone who would appreciate these alerts,
please let us know and we'll enroll them on a trial basis.

Also, feel free to forward our alerts.






Reply via email to