At 06:52 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Sampo A Syreeni wrote: >Well, I think that as long as a conventional photograph is taken from a >public place, it does not constitute a punishable breach of privacy. What's >so very different about doing the same thing with IR? Heh, maybe someone should take some IR (video with IR filter removed) pictures of Janet Reno, and publish. (Then again, maybe not.)
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Mac Norton
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Steve Furlong
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes jim bell
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes David Honig
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes David Honig
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Richard Fiero
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes POF
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Steven Furlong
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni
- IR "TEMPESTING" (was Re: police IR sear... sunder
- IR "TEMPESTING" (was Re: police IR ... Steven Furlong
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Michael Motyka
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Harmon Seaver