On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:18:47AM +0300, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > Of course it's wrongheaded -- you're confusing the act, and the act of > distributing a record of an act. Well put. Photographs of murder are legal for newspapers to reproduce, generally speaking, why not porn? But we can't expect Choate to get this. (Additional hint to Choate: Murder is illegal, having sex generally isn't.) -Declan
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet ... James B. DiGriz
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Declan McCullagh
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet ... James B. DiGriz
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Tim May
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Tim May
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Tim May
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Tim May
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Sampo Syreeni
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet ... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet p... Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Inter... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet p... Jim Choate
- Free kiddie porn would save a lot of kids from being... Ray Dillinger
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... georgemw
- Re: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn ... Sunder
