On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 10:37:45PM -0700, citizenQ wrote: > I read it. Yes but in the deconstruction/analysis, you STILL don't > support your position WRT the objections raised, you switch over to > "maybe it shouldn't be done so fast." But then you say the bill > "will have to go to conference committee and then, probably, both > chambers of Congress for another vote.." I raised few policy objections. Instead I laid out what the bill would do. It sounds like you're what Tim would call a simp-wimp apologist for using Carnivore without court orders who is actively trying to sabotage privacy. > So it's not being passed *into law* at midnite by voice vote, Never said it was. > it will be subject to investigation and review, Nope. -Declan
