-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
on Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:24:44PM -0700, Meyer Wolfsheim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
<...>
> For the most part, Mutt is an excellent email client. However, I'm
> actually going to correct myself, and say that it *is* Mutt that doesn't
> play well with others in this case. I have no problem with Mutt favoring
> RFC 2015/3156 for PGP handling. As someone else recently pointed out on
> one of the GnuPG lists, the flaw is in Mutt's inability to do normal PGP
> messages.
What's "normal" PGP messages?
There is an option to clearsign by default. I've elected not to do
this.
Peace.
- --
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7skPmOEeIn1XyubARAg7WAJ9/iuaFoqSYcKjmp5SagNADWYx2EwCeJty9
abqIir0y+FgzH56WyAcjRww=
=l8hU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
