-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Where's the "discovery" here? I posted a story from Stratfor to the list
Tuesday, Sept 25. Oh well, glad you found it anyway.

>Yup, by far the most intelligent analysis I've seen.

It's good, but I'm guessing the classified work from RAND is even better. It all
comes down to who gets the cabinet's ear: I could be wrong, but either way it
looks like the cooler heads at least have a chance this time around.

Here's to hoping.

~F.


> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 07:50:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:58:01 -0500 (CDT)
> > From: Nathanael Dermyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [FREE] stratfor
> >
> > http://www.stratfor.com
> >
> > This is a website about strategic forcasting.  These people really know
> > their shit.
> >
> > Read these in order ... these are their forcasts for the war we're about
> > be thrown into
> >
> > http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109242145.htm (intro - conceptual framework)
> > http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109252150.htm (war plan - afghan theatre)
> > http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109262355.htm (war plan - us theatre)
> > http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109272330.htm (war plan - intercontinental
> > theatre)
> > http://www.stratfor.com/home/0109282120.htm (war plan - follow up)
> >
> > -Nathanael
>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.0

wl8EARECAB8FAju3fDIYHGF1dG8zMDEwOTRAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEKadvsVlUK4P
wVAAniDu4nrqbemrOqboh3wnNa+K/AAJAJ4775cunOECfF46aviHAHb4S3IoOA==
=7Jl5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to