-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

From: "Faustine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcel wrote:

>Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them did have nightmares about the
> Constitution. Not as a piece of paper dancing around on Mickey Mouse legs or
> whatever the hell you're getting at, but as an idea repersenting the rule
> of law that was going to lead to them being jailed for murder. Which
> unfortunately never happened, but so it goes.

>>Thanks for proving my point. (For the intellectually impaired: the
>>Constitution never DOES anything. Your magical belief in its virtues is
>>equivalent to pagan's beliefs in idols: they accomplish nothing. A law must
>>be backed by force - and it's the FORCE that does this or that, not the
>>law.)

Of course. I'm not disagreeing with you here at all-- and in fact, I made a
similar point in a discussion here a week or so ago.  The rule of law is 
worthless without a mechanism to back it up; what could be more obvious? But
without it the weak, stupid, moral and isolated are entirely at the mercy of
the strong, clever, ruthless and organized. 

Without the Constitution, the government would be nothing more (and no better
than) an incredibly powerful gang. You think there's abuse of power now, what
do you suppose would happen with no law to stand in their way of stamping out
whoever they damn well pleased? If there were no law and you opposed such a 
monstrous supergang, do you really expect you would come out ahead? Or even stay
alive? How? Serious questions. 


>>I'm not objecting to the language; English is fine. I'm objecting to
>>delusions. Laws don't ACT, no matter what language you're using.

I never said they did: through the mechanism of the judicial system (backed up
by the aptly named "law enforcement") they serve as a check on people acting to
destroy society. The Founders had it right all along, you can't blame them for
the complete hash subsequent administrations made of the American system. 


>You should rely more on your guns and less on your papers.

Isn't that precisely what all corrupt, evil and tyrranical police and statist
government officials everywhere say? 

I'm sure Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and every two-bit petty dictator since the
beginning of time would agree with you.


~Faustine.



***

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- -Thomas Paine

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies. (Diffie-Helman/DSS-only version)

iQA/AwUBPB+vo/g5Tuca7bfvEQLSFACcCuN0NM2UEWtPkgou4xXppoAXyisAn33d
CLiHC5fnhluRssyTeCE9XGzr
=ISWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to