Death penalty statistics remain a state secret in China.
"Political interference is common," Amnesty International says on its 
website. "Often, mass executions are carried out before major events or 
public holidays as a warning to others. Execution is by shooting or lethal 
injection and sometimes takes place within hours of sentencing.
"Many cases are reported in which death sentences were passed on the basis 
of contentious evidence, including confessions extracted under torture."
"The constant refrain of the anarchist song is that the system of 
government and law in modern States is often the cause of, rather than the 
remedy for, disorder. Most laws in Western democracies protect private 
property and economic inequality rather than civil rights. An authoritarian 
society with a repressive morality encourages the psychological disorders 
which lead to rape, murder and assault. And punishment by its very nature 
tends to alienate and embitter rather than reform or deter."[12] Over one 
hundred years ago, the Russian anarchist Peter Kropotkin suggested that 
crime can be divided into three categories :- property related crime, 
government related crime and crimes against the person. In putting forward 
this analysis he was arguing that if you remove property and government - 
in other words if you base society on freedom, socialism and democracy - 
you remove two of the biggest causes of crime. It could also be argued that 
a large number of crimes against the person (people injured in muggings, 
for example) have their root in crimes against property.
'law enforcement' by themselves. Perhaps, for example, people will be 
elected as investigators when specific anti-social behaviour needs to be 
investigated. In some cases it will be necessary to have people with 
particular expertise such as in forensics. But these people will be given 
no particular positions of power as a result of this expertise - their 
function will remain purely administrative. The idea of 'prosecuting' an 
offender will be done away with. Instead - where necessary - evidence will 
be presented before a democratically elected community forum, weighed up in 
an open manner with the 'accused' given every opportunity to question it 
(either personally or through a representative of his/her own choosing - 
there won't be any fancy lawyers or judges in silly wigs). In addition, the 
idea of revenge or punishment will have no place in the justice system but 
it will be more about restitution and compensation for the victim. The aim 
will be to ensure that the perpetrator of the 'crime' makes some form of 
recompense to the victim, and that the behaviour is not repeated. As has 
been said, we do not have a crystal ball and therefore cannot predict with 
any certainty exactly what will happen in an anarchist society. We do not 
claim to have all the answers but hope that this article and others will 
lead to a discussion among anarchists about how a future society should 
deal with anti-social elements. It is a complex area and the only thing 
which can be said with certainty is that the only solution can be through 
freedom and democracy. 1 Peter Kropotkin, 'Law and Authority', Quoted in 
'Demanding The Impossible - A History of Anarchism' by Peter Marshall, Page 
31 2 Ireland is of course by no means unique in this context 3 Text 
available on the web at http://lark.phoblacht.net/bmitchell.html

Reply via email to