----- Original Message ----- From: "Carol A. Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: The Traitors Among Us. Stunning Wash. Post Article
> The Traitors Among Us. Stunning Wash. Post Article > > by Carol A. Valentine > Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum > http://www.Public-Action.com > Copyright, January, 2002 > May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes > > January 26 -- If you want to understand what has happened to our > beloved country, you will not want to miss this article in today's > Washington Post, pg. B11: > > "Israel's Evangelical Approach. U.S. Christian Zionists Nurtured as > Political, Tourism Force. " > > I enclose both the URL and the text, below (Attachment 1). > > For further understanding of this vitally important subject, I also > enclose the text of article written by C.E. Carlson, "Kulchur Klash." > (Attachment 2.) In particular, read the sections following the words > ARE PHARISEES EXTINCT? > > Now, a story which puts some flesh on the issue at hand: > > The brother of a friend of mine works in the South. He was > discussing US foreign policy with a fellow worker, a retired career > Navy man who describes himself as a fundamentalist Christian. The > Navy man is a devote of TeeVee preacher Pat Robertson. > > My friend's brother was arguing that the US policy towards Israel > amounts to treason to the US. During the discussion, the subject of > the USS Liberty came up. Believe it or not, this Navy man had never > heard of Israel's attack on the USS Liberty in 1967. My friend's > brother referred him to > > http://www.USSLiberty.org > > The next day, the Navy man came into the office and said: "I don't > care what Israel did to the USS Liberty. I put my God ahead of my > country." > > There it is in a nutshell. One story--but it superbly illustrates the point. > > "Fundamentalist Christians" (sometimes called "Fundies") are, > characteristically, not Christian at all. They reject Jesus's > notion of the universality of mankind, the belief that each of us is > equally precious in the eyes of the Lord. They rely on the Talmud, > the written laws and commentaries of the Pharisees, not the New > Testament. Religiously, Fundies are fellow travelers in the dark > political cult of Talmudism, sometimes called "Zionism" and sometimes > called "Judaism." > > Fundies will do anything for Israel and "the Jews," whom they worship > as God or God's little brother. They are only too happy to be the > Jews' slaves, and insist we all join in their bondage. Certainly > their beliefs are anti-Christian. > > More to the point: Characteristically, Fundies are traitors to > America. Yes,they are the first to wave the American flag in order > to spill the blood of those who stand in the way of Israeli ambition. > Along with Jews, Fundies scream loudest for Arab blood, even though > all rational analysis shouts that Israel and israeli agents in > America were responsible for 9-11. They will do anything to help > Israel achieve world domination. > > Fundies hate the Bill of Rights and the American ideal of "equal > justice under law." Need evidence of this? Ask your friendly > next-door so called "Christian" fundamentalist about the Waco > Holocaust. Ask them if they have ever lifted their voice up against > what befell the 80-odd goyim in Waco in 1993. Then find out what > their attitude is to the death of Jews in WWII or at the hands of > Palestinian freedom fighters in contemporary Israel. > > Thus you will see that only "the Jews" really matter. Only "the > Jews" qualify as human. Thus Fundies follow the teachings of the > Talmud in their anti-American beliefs. ( See quotes in Attachment 3.) > > Zionist "Christians" operate as Israeli super patriots, never > questioning their own loyalties to Israel or weighing them against > other principles or values. As the example of the Navy man shows, > this loyalty transcends all loyalty to America (or any other native > country), and even overt oaths of loyalty. Most astoundingly, few > people would see the Navy man's Zionism as the fundamental treason it > is, and it is unlikely that his officers would have a problem with > it, much less prosecute him for treason. > > Take your pick. Do you prefer the Jewish Zionists of the Clinton > Administration, or the "Christian" Zionists of the Bush > Administration? > > More and more, the Fundies and their puppet masters show their vile > corruption to the world. Today's Washington Post article is an > in-your-face, out-of-the closet exhibition of these truths. What are > we going to do about it? > > === Attachment 1 "Israel's Evangelical Approach" === > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40764-2002Jan25.html > > Israel's Evangelical Approach > By Mark O'Keefe > > In an effort to solidify its relationship with American evangelicals, > the government of Israel has launched initiatives that include > expense-paid trips to the Holy Land and strategy sessions with the > Christian Coalition and other conservative groups. > > The objectives: to revive Israel's sagging tourism industry and > strengthen grass-roots support in the United States. The target > audience is the estimated 98 million U.S. evangelicals, but > especially a subset of that group, Christian Zionists. > > That group believes that Jews are God's chosen people and have a > divine deed to their contested land, in accordance with a covenant > described in the first book of the Bible. > > But Christian Zionism is about more than private belief. Its > "anything for Israel" theology has the potential to affect U.S. > foreign policy in the same way that the Christian right has > influenced domestic issues through political pressure. > > "If I felt the administration or anyone in Congress was moving away > from support of Israel, believe me, I'd encourage people to pick up > the phone and tell their legislators, 'Don't you dare!' " said Janet > Parshall, who hosts a weekday syndicated show on evangelical radio > stations across the country. > > One intriguing question, posed frequently in Israeli government and > U.S. evangelical circles, is whether President Bush, who has been > outspoken in his evangelical beliefs, privately holds Christian > Zionist views. > > "It's one of the common explanations [of] . . . why and how Bush is > sympathetic to Israel and its cause," said Moshe Fox, minister for > public affairs at the Israeli Embassy in Washington. "I haven't had a > chance to talk to the president about this, but that view is out > there, and it is quite common." > > White House spokesman Ken Lisaius would not comment on whether Bush's > religious beliefs might affect his actions toward Israel. "The > president makes policy decisions based on policy factors," Lisaius > said. > > It is clear, however, that Israel considers U.S. evangelicals a vital > constituency. > > "Are we increasing our efforts this year? Yes," said Rami Levi, > Israel's New York City-based tourism commissioner for North America. > > "But we've been increasing our efforts for many years. What we know > is evangelicals are very supportive of Israel. They see all of Israel > -- not just our tourism, but our economy, our national interest -- as > a love. It's their spiritual belief that that is the way it has to > be. We can always rely on them." > > The number of visitors to Israel plunged 55 percent in 2001, compared > with the previous, record breaking year, according to the Jerusalem > Post. The drop is blamed on fear of terrorism and other violence. > > In a marketing plan dated last month, TouchPoint Solutions, a > Colorado Springs consulting agency hired by Israel's Ministry of > Tourism, describes how to reverse that trend by appealing to U.S. > evangelicals. Highlights include: > > * Persuading the top 30 evangelical Zionists, through face-to-face > meetings, to visit and promote Israel. Those named in a separate > TouchPoint document, "Who are the Christian Zionists?" include > religious broadcaster Jerry Falwell, Christian Coalition founder Pat > Robertson, Texas pastor John Hagee, best-selling author Tim LaHaye > and Parshall. > > * Sending a letter to the 100,000 largest evangelical churches and a > postcard to 350,000 others, directing them to Israel's tourism Web > site, GoIsrael.com. > > * Conducting "Israel Solidarity Days" in 100 cities, beginning with > Colorado Springs, from Feb. 24 to March 1. Publicly, prayer > ceremonies will focus on Israel and its biblical importance. > Privately, local evangelical leaders -- whether pastors, business > people or athletes -- will be urged to make "solidarity trips" to > Israel. Some will have their expenses paid by Israel. > > "The idea is to sell the sellers," TouchPoint President Butch Maltby > said, adding that the multimillion dollar marketing plan has been > agreed upon in principle, with certain aspects dependent on funding > by the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. > > Maltby described tourism as more than an economic matter. "It's also > a political tool. Every person that comes to Israel becomes an > ambassador to Israel. Every tourist becomes a public relations > person." > > The blurring of the lines between piety, politics and public > relations was evident at a Jan. 8 meeting at the Israeli Embassy in > Washington. Two representatives from the Christian Coalition were > among 18 evangelical leaders attending. > > Each participant received "Why Christians Should Support Israel," by > Richard Booker, a Texas-based Christian minister. The booklet quotes > Genesis 17:7-8 in its argument that God made an eternal covenant in > which he gave "the land in which you are a stranger," modern-day > Israel, to Abraham and his descendants. > > Jews and Muslims both see Abraham as their patriarch. But Christian > Zionists contend that Muslims don't share in the promise of land > because they are the descendants of Ishmael, the son of Abraham and > his maidservant, Hagar. Ishmael was not part of the "everlasting > covenant" with God and inherited no land. > > Jews are seen as the descendants of Isaac, the son of Abraham and his > wife, Sarah. Isaac did inherit property. So only Jews are regarded as > holding a rightful claim to the land that has been a source of > international conflict since Israel became a state in 1948, Christian > Zionists say. > > The embassy called the gathering the first "American-Christian > grass-roots networks briefing and strategy discussion." Plans call > for similar discussions monthly. > > During the meeting, Shari Dollinger, the embassy's officer for > interreligious affairs, led a discussion of how Christian college > students could lead pro-Israel events on campus. She said she also > sees Israel reaching out more than ever in the United States. > > "There's a new realization that we can activate the Christian grass > roots," she said. > > === Attachment 2 "Kulchur Klash" ==== > > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:42:32 -0600 (CST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PHARISEE WATCH: Kulchur Klash 2002 > X-Loop-Detect: 1 > > Part 1. The Church (www.whtt.org/articles/020116.htm) > By C. E. Carlson > INTRODUCTION: > > A church service or Sunday morning TV evangelist sermon is usually > not complete without words to the effect that "our society is > crumbling." I heard these exact words preached only last Sunday. > One who mulls this over might ask the question, how can a Christian > country like ours have a crumbing society. Ought this not be an > oxymoron? > > Most other nations have long viewed America as one of the world's > most Christian nations. This is probably correct in the sense that an > overwhelming percentage of Americans classify ourselves as > "Christians" in the census and public opinion polls, and if judging > by the number of churches and church attendance. Politicians for > major office with rare exception mirror this preference by making it > known that they too like to be thought of as "Christians." Based on > these measures of Christianity in America, we should be doing fine as > a culture,.or else Christianity must not be what it claims to be, a > societal success by virtue of its acts. > > A third possibility (the true one) is that our society appears to one > of Christ followers but is not; the abundance of churches, the > enormous TV Christian budgets, and even the attendance itself are > signs not of holiness but of affluence and boredom. If this is true, > then the pastor at the pulpit may be right, our society may indeed be > crumbling. > > A hallmark of Christ's teachings are a call to love all men, not > simply those one agrees with, and to seek peace with that love even > at a cost -- even to place peace before affluence. Any who deny this > deny most of what Christ said. That includes those who claim to > follow Him from the lofty heights of federal government and the > cockpits of war machines. Those who call themselves by Christ's > name, yet doubt what you have just read, are invited to read the book > of Matthew, especially the 5th chapter, before reading one more line > of this essay. > The Bible, Genesis Network: > > http://www.genesis.net.au/~bible/kjv/matthew > > In spite of our leaders professions and oft-stated suggestions in > word and innuendo, our government is now undeniably engaged in almost > continuous aggressive violence which have lately become referred to > as undeclared "wars." Few reasonable persons will deny that the > result is and will be accelerating dollar costs (inflation) at home > and death and destruction to others delicately referred to as > "collateral damage." Nonetheless, dozens of statements from many > popular Christian leaders indicate that they support, virtually > without objection, the administration's stated plan to continue the > Afghanistan war into dozens of other countries. To this end, > Secretary of State Dick Cheney, has stated as many as 50 countries > may be involved. Few pastors or TV evangelists have objected. > > An observer from outer space might well ask, "If America is indeed a > Christian nation, then doesn't this make Christianity a religion of > crusades and wars?" If Christianity is not a religion of war, what > are popular American Christians doing to prevent and ameliorate the > serial wars damage to less fortunate persons who are clearly victims > of the American unmatched and unlimited destructive power, and what > about the psychological damage to those asked to push the buttons on > mass assassination? The answer is, far from helping, most professing > Christian leaders are throwing gas on the fire. We must first ask, > who within the ranks of those who call themselves Christians are > responsible for promoting war, and why do they do it? > > The Biblical and secular accounts of Jesus arrest, persecution, trial > and execution attest to the power of the Pharisee sect today now know > as Judaism. It is noted here that Jerusalem was completely destroyed > by war in 70 AD when Palestine, as the Romans called it, was under > Pharisaic religious influence if not political control. This > occurred less then 35 years after Christ predicted its destruction in > the 19th Chapter of Luke. In this Part I. we examine, as Jesus > Christ did, the historic religious leaders who called themselves > "Pharisees." Jesus had much to say about this sect that virtually > controlled spiritual and political life in Judea, collected tributes, > and even manipulated the leaders of the occupying Roman Legion. > > PART I: ARE PHARISEES EXTINCT? > The Pharisees Jesus denounced have not gone away, but have > established an even more formidable control mechanism in our society > than ever existed in Christ's mortal lifetime. Some are Christian > Pharisees and some are Jewish. First, let us define them. The noun > "Pharisee" occurs, according to Strongs' Concordance, 78 times in the > New Testament, much more frequently than "Satan." Yet usage of the > word has been largely eliminated from teaching in many Bibles > studies, the pulpits of America's churches, professing Christian > media and even seminaries. Who were and who are the Pharisees, and > is there a logical reason why we rarely hear about them today? > > WEBSTER DEFINES PHARISEE: "One of the members of a school or party > among the ancient Jews noted for the strict formal observance of the > rites and validity of traditions of the elders." Further on: " > Pharisee interpretation provided the standard of observation and > belief for the great majority of the Jews from the 1st Century A.D." > Pharisaic: "Hypocritical, self righteous and censorious of others" > -- Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language, > 2nd Edition, 1950. > > Webster's all but forgotten definition is an accurate one. Pharisees > are in conflict with Jesus whenever they met. Followers of Christ > confronted the Pharisees repeatedly. It was a "Jewish" sect that > followed the "traditions of the elders" as Webster stated and as > Jesus also said. These traditions are now know as the "Talmud." But > what the 1950 dictionary did not recognize is that Pharisaism was > even then no longer exclusive Jewish, as it once may have been, for > Pharisaic influence long before the 1950s could probably have been > found in every denomination in America, busily reshaping Christianity > into the Pharisaic image. It was then and has become both a Judeo > and a Christian sect. > > All mention of the Pharisaism occurs in the New Testament where its > formed the center of conflict around Jesus, His disciples, and His > followers. As Jesus predicted many were stalked, scourged and killed > by the Pharisees. In addition to the 78 verses in which Pharisee > are mentioned by name, pronouns including "you" point to Pharisees in > many additional verses. The Pharisees are the object of Jesus' > debate and denunciation in entire chapters in Matthew, Luke and John > as well as the writings of Paul who claimed he once had been a > Pharisee, having killed Christians. These many references provide an > undeniable accounts of the ongoing conflict and plot against Jesus' > life for all who read. The noun Pharisee occurs about three times > more often than the infamous name of Judas, 30 times more than Satan > and 50 more times than the name of Pontius Pilot. It is, without a > doubt, the most denounced noun in the New Testament. It is the only > name that Jesus constantly associated with the Satan. > > Jesus followers feared the political power of the Pharisees more than > the Romans. Yet the word Pharisee is pointedly ignored by most > Christian leaders and all but forgotten in modern evangelical > Christendom and the ranks of the celebrity media broadcasters. > "Pharisee" may also be the most avoided word found in the Bible. > Some pastors and most televangelists are capable of preaching the > year through without ever mentioning Pharisee, except in passing by > on the way to some other point. Pharisees are wrongly treated as an > extinct and irrelevant species. > > Organized Bible study courses rarely mention whom the Pharisees were, > why Jesus pronounced upon them so harshly and never treat the > Pharisee as an anti-Christ type to watch out for in our day. > Celebrity Christians on national TV never suggest that the Pharisee's > war on Jesus has anything at all to do with His followers, or that > the sect may have survived to this day. > > CENSORSHIP IN THE CHURCH > The word Pharisee has not yet been removed from any Bibles we know > of, but most Bible commentaries and concordances avoid any serious > treatment of how they operate to control civil government, and who > their successors are today. For instance, the concordance in the new > Thompson Study Bible, a very popular one that is supposedly designed > to help readers understand the scriptures, has all but eliminated any > mention of this sect. Amazingly, Thompson new edition concordance > lists only one of the 78 sites, yet its previous 1962 edition listed > four. Pray tell, what happened to the other three verses it > previously recognized, not to mention 74 never cited at all, The four > references cited are atypically favorable having to do with Paul's > own Pharisaic history. It appears the publisher is whitewashing the > word and deleting "Pharisee" from its readers' vocabularies. This > is unthinkable because Jesus denounced the Pharisees, the most > powerful and destructive faction of anti-Christianity calling them a > "generation of vipers" and "sons of Satan." But most study Bibles > and Bible courses omit all but casual mention of Pharisees. > Curiously, the much-maligned paraphrase Living Bible Concordance > contains the key sites found in Strongs, and is well worth reading. > > TODAYS PHARISEES > Let us examine what has become of the Pharisees in our modern society > and how they continue to attempt to control our lives. The New > Testament tells us they controlled Judea at the time of Jesus' > mission. Pharisees, both Christian professing and Jewish, control > Palestine again today with unimaginable brutality. Needless to say, > we do not think Pharisees have gone away; else they would not be > tampering with our beliefs. Nor did Webster think they had gone > away, as he says in his 1950 definition that Pharisaism became modern > Judaism. > > The venerable traditionally Christian Webster is not the only one to > say this? Proper definitions are taken from correct and proper usage > of that less censored age. Many Rabbis have proudly provided the > rabbinical sources for Webster's definition. The Universal Jewish > Encyclopedia, 1943, state: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces > it descent without a break from the Pharisees- their ideas and > methods are found in the Talmud." And Rabbi Louis Finklestein, head > of the Jewish Theological Seminary, stated in his book "History of > the Jews" 1949,"Pharisaism became talmudist...the spirit of the > ancient Pharisees survived unaltered ...therefore any discourse > regarding the Jewish religion must be based on Talmudism." Jewish > leaders were in the 1950s obviously were proud of their claim to be > Pharisees. > > This is not to suggest that this all Jews to be Pharisees any more > than all Pharisees are Jews. But Pharisees dominated religious > thinking in Jesus time and have far too much to say about what the > leaders of our government do. Much worse they have established > influencing over what Christians think. Pharisaic Judaism attempted > but failed to censor Christian thought in the first century; today > they are succeeding. This is indeed a sad reflection on popular > Christian leadership. > > THE PHARISEE BIBLE > The Pharisees of today have moved heaven and earth to discourage > thousands of pastors and televangelists from teaching what Jesus said > so clearly. The godfather of the Biblical censors is the powerfully > promoted Scofield study Bible, first printed in England in 1908, but > sold in America. Scofield's Study Bible is a traditional, difficult > to read, King James version, doctored with hundred of easy to read > added notes and inserted descriptive chapter and verse headings. > Most of the notes are about the "rapture" the "end times" and the > return of the ancient tribe of Israelites to the Holy land. But > there are no meaningful notes about Pharisaism. > > The latest, much changed edition of Scofield Study Bible was printed > in 1962 and boldly elevated "anti Semitism" to the status of a "sin" > a sort of 11th Commandment it would seem. Each of the four successive > editions, beginning in 1908, have further advanced the claims of the > self-proclaimed Jews to the real estate known today as the State of > Israel, a nation which did not even exist when its first three > edition were published. The latest, 1962 Edition goes so far as to > contains a note stating that "FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF > ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE JUDGMENT" (page 20) But it contains > hardly a note interpreting any of the hundreds of verses Jesus spoke > in his daily conflict with the Pharisees and their plot for his > death. Scofield ignores all were giving the reader the impression > these are of little consequence, and since the King James version is > slow reading at best, readers tend to rely on the notes. Most study > Bibles we have seen, including the Thompson,! > follow Scofield's Pharisee friendly example. These footnotes of men > are a corrupt the Bible of God, as it stated in its last book. > > The first of the 78 mentions of Pharisees occurs in Matthew 3:7-8 > when they appear in numbers at the Jordan River where John the > Baptist was proclaiming the coming of the Messiah. John's firm and > condemnatory words spoken to them were: "But when he saw many of the > Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O > generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to > come? Bring forth therefore fruits meat for repentance." John the > Baptist went on to rebuke their claim to holiness, refuting their > claim of being chosen people by descent from Abraham stating: "and > think not to say within yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father;' > for I say unto you that God is able to raise up from these stones > children unto Abraham." So much for the chosen people. (King James > Version) > > One early exchange between Christ and the Pharisees occurred in > Matthew 12 where Jesus called them: "An evil and adulterous > generation" in a powerful exchange that fills most of the chapter12, > and most of the long chapter of Matthew 23 is Jesus' condemnation of > the Pharisees, a small part of which states: "Wherefore ye be > witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which > killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye > serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of > hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and > scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them > shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to > city." (Mt. 23:31-34) > > PROMOTERS OF ISRAELI PHARISAISM Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jack > Van Empe and dozens more like them have made careers by promoting > Israel as a political state and a chosen race. Thousands of local > church leaders are following this example. Many of these > self-professed Christian leaders are the Pharisees of today, > achieving fame and influence by pleasing the media secular Zionist > media powers. > > Pharisees were once exclusively Judean, "Jews" in the vernacular of > our day. Many contend that Israeli Patriots assert more control over > America's political parties, news media and the banking system than > is healthy for a Christian society. This should be obvious to anyone > who will look at the media; then read the Bible references to > Pharisaism. But it is largely from within that the vitality of > Christianity in being diluted, not from outside. The control of > media may be a "Jewish" problem, but the perversion of Christianity > is not. Many professing Christians at all levels of leadership have > abandon their Bible given responsibility in exchange for the > footnotes written by men. These are the Pharisees of today. Part > II will deal with how Christian leaders have allowed themselves to > become Pharisees, supporting untold government brutality, cruelty, > and waste while claiming Christ's name. End > > Suggested background reading: > "The Body Snatchers' Report On Planet Earth" our cultural problem, > as viewed by and intelligent visitor from space > (http://www.whtt.org/articles/010119pw.htm) > > "SHERRY'S WAR" Why many professing Christians support war against > Islam, political repression and torture by Israel without considering > that these are unchristian acts. Hard copy 20 pages, reference, > available free to all contributors, bulk copies 10 for $30.00 > delivered in USA, for overseas rates or larger quantities please > inquire. (http://www.whtt.org/articles/010411pw.htm) > > The Bible, Genesis Network: > (http://www.genesis.net.au/~bible/kjv/matthew/) We suggest every > skeptical reader look up and read each of the 78 references to > Pharisee. > > WHTT ACT-TANK RECOMMENDATION: If you agree with us, help us give > every follower an opportunity to read this Pharisee Watch, and ask > your own pastor to preach and teach on what Jesus said about > Pharisees. > We Hold These Truths (www.whtt.org) > 4839 E. Greenway Road, #151 > Scottsdale, AZ 85254 > 480 947 3329 > > === Attachment 3 ==== > > In fact Jews (Talmudists) regard goyim as a lower life form, as > sub-human. According to the Talmud, non-Jews can be slaughtered like > cattle. > > * The intent to kill a non-Jew is so laudable that even if a Jew is > accidently killed in an attempt to kill a non-Jew, the murderous Jew > suffers no liability. > > * But if a Jew intends to kill another Jew and does so, he is liable. > > (Babylonian Talmud, Soncino Edition, London, 1935. Sanhedrin 78b-79a.) > > * If a Jew murders a Gentile, the Jew suffers no death penalty. > (Sanhedrin 57a.) > > * if a Gentile strikes a Jew in the jaw, the Gentile, having stricken > the "Divine Presence" (that is, a Jew) suffers the death penalty. > (Sanhedrin 58b, pg.388). > > === > -- > Carol A. Valentine > President, Public Action, Inc. > http://www.Public-Action.com > See the handiwork of the world's leading terrorist organization, the FBI: > Visit the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum > > 911 Lies exposed at http://www.public-action.com/911/ > * Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS > * The Taliban Home Video > * Bin Laden: AUTHENTIC INTERVIEW > * 911 Terror: Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics > * Osama bin Surplus > * Osama bin CIA Agent > * Press Uses Actors In War On Islam ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Armageddon or New Age? Daily Magazine. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/armageddon-or-newage To unsubscribe send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
