> paradise - don't touch MY herd. I have no quibbles with such coinages as "anarchist community." A bunch of folks, a commune, an extended family, even a group like Cypherpunks can be--and usually is, in fact--an "anarchist community." In the very understandable sense that there are no "uses of force" to impose order or rule of law. "An arch," as we should all know by now. <<
Why not discuss the sharp and clear differences between anarcho-capitalists and trad anarchists then? Illustrated for starters at http://world.std.com/~mhuben/leftlib.html >>The international trading community is an anarchy, as noted by Bruce Benson in "The Enterprise of Law" and discussed many times by others, including David Friedman and even myself. > > Well, we had that. It has been tried. It wasn't stable enough. What we > have now > descended from such communities. It's just that communities that had > better > enterprising social engineers beat the shit out of communities that > were ... > content the way there were. Which disputes the anarchist community notion is which way? Anarchies are in fact the norm, not something that has rarely been tried. > --Tim May Anarcho-capitalism has NOT been tried,Should It? Friedman and May seem to prefer life in Cali for all its faults.
