>>I had to look up the relevant post to believe it wasn't somehow being used out of context<boggle>.
It is being used out of context.It meant I was happy to be left alone.I'm also happy to engage with anyone who wants to engage with me.I would post a lot less here if I wasn't mentioned. >>Mattd: Have you considered a distributed system to "store" your rantings and fascinations? << Que? Where? How? URLs? >>Unlike the spam content you used to [attempt to] justify your actions, you are acting deliberately, with malice aforethought as it were, << It occured to me 'round the time of "the mattblog that ate cypherpunks,"a couple of weeks ago. >>to steal the use of others [generously donated] resources. << "I am not a crook!" >>This is beyond disgusting, it's an abhorrent act. << Hey,this is the internet.try plovers movies,you want disgusting. >>Your "position" that using the archives as a storage medium is excused because you have "paid your dues" by being arrested by a completely unrelated third party (the goverment of whatever place you infest) is not sound - the exact same "logic" would allow me to break into your house and put an end to whats left of your miserable existence, without repercussions, merely because I have been arrested a few times myself. OK, more than a few, but, I digress... << My position on cybersquatting is one minor argument.(Its still as valid as europeans colonizing the middle east because they were persecuted where they were)If you break in my house there could be some repercussions in your general direction.What I'm doing should be compared with others like me and the *hard* spam here.Its no worse and I would argue its better because I will defend my posts,offlist if you prefer.The storage aspect is a bonus.If it annoys corporate shills like peter Trei and May syncophants like you that's another bonus. >>Jim, if you expunge this asshole's "storage", he will likely find greener pastures to abuse elsewhere.<< *He* might also go postal on you and all those who would censor *him*Would you recommend some green acres? >>This would be an act of self-defense, not censorship.<< How am I attacking you? Showing disrespect for your pathetic Americacentric CALC delusions? And I think everyone here (and maybe even mattd if he ever gets the medication he so desperately needs) << Zyclon B? Soviet era psychiatry?( I've got some Xanax,N.bush,if your reading.)Global warming spoiled my psylocybin. >>would both agree and applaud. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson << We all should applaud your making more than a snide,cheap shot,one line comment,pity its a low logic plea for censorship from a Tim May suckup.
