On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, matt taylor wrote:

> You have to be an upover nutcase? Who banned nutcases? When? Where can I

I have no problem with nutcases, as long as they're not disruptive. You're
being disruptive to this list.

> appeal?EL should know all about the soviet abuse of psychiatry.

I don't want you instituionalized. I just want you to behave borderline
normally on this channel.

>   >>who's using this public resource for private dumping ground, <<
>
> If its public it cant be private.It's not *dumping either.Has EL complained

Yes, it's public, not your private property. So stop dumping your trash
here.

> to one of the hard spam merchants here?

I try to track down and report spammers whenever it is possible. You're
fortunately not hard to track.

> ALL the complainers and whingers were bested by me in debate that's easily
> checked.

?

>  >>while posting *a lot* (including profanity and casual death threats,
> iirc) <<
>
> A lot to you maybe but not in proportion to the noise.The fact I bested you
> in debate rankle? Profanity and casual death threats oh my! From an
> Australian! Gott in Himmel!

I don't give a damn about your death threats and profanity. Your ISP does:

http://www.nex.com.au/support/terms.htm

"The customer must not use their Internet access to annoy, harass or harm
other Internet customers.

The customer must not use their Internet access for any unlawful purpose
or in any unlawful manner."

Clear enough? Shall I pull up a number of your posts which are in
violation of these rules you accepted when you signed up with your ISP?

>  >>and constantly changing his email address, thus avoiding filtering.<<
>
> I have a meat addy and had to change my ISP recently,someone I vaguely
> remember making a fool of take's exception.
> I'll try and stay with my present ISP to humor the lunatic but he now says
> he's complaining to my new ISP!
> I deny altering adress's to avoid filtering and I can prove it.Proof of my
> alleged misdeeds looks thin to nonexistant.

I had to change my filtering rules thrice to block you. This means you're
not interested in being minimally disruptive, but actually trying to get
past people's rules. This won't do.

>   >>I don't propose the list policy to be changed, this particular forum
> should be unmoderated.<<
>
> Gee thanks Adolf.
>
>  >> However, complaining to Matt's ISP (whose terms he's clearly in
> violation with) <<
>
> Que? I didn't start sending large unsolicited e-mails and continue after
> being asked to stop.EL has.JJ and lord high executioner.

Yes, you're absolutely innocent. Matt Taylor, keep up polluting this list,
and I'll personally pull up the choicest of your fewmets, and forward them
to your ISP.

>  >>and some grassroot pressure (if there are 100 people on his list willing
> to send back each of his messages 10x, he's dealing with a 1000x
> amplification factor on each and single of his messages) seems to be in
> order. Does anyone see anything wrong with this plan? <<
>
> Well as recipient I could mention the shoot first and ask questions later
> aspect.Then theres the fact that I only post material here I can
> rationalize as being of some interest to at least some of you.I'm not

Who's thinking Matt Taylor contributes valuable material to this list? A
show of hands? Yohn Young, perhaps?

> sabotaging the list and have promised to keep my posts in proportion to the
> *hard* spam.Eugene is a unilateralist,a cowboy and is risking a repeat of a

At some point you were contributing at least 10 posts in my inbox.

> previous failed policy.Like the president he should be killfiled.All the
> whingers about me on this list have been made fools of by me in legit
> debate so their motives in attacking me are suspect.Pure ad Hominen from
> such imbeciles means I won the debate,why do people hate a winner indeed.I
> appeal to the sweet reason of the list.
> Until I figure out a way to counter this below the belt attack on me I

Returning all your emails to you is a below the belt attack? Huh?

> shall be forced to return all EL's stuff to him and here by hand.I would
> appreciate any tech advice from other list members,TIA.Kill the
> president,matt T.


Reply via email to